Adversarial Concept Erasure in Kernel Space
Shauli Ravfogel, Francisco Vargas, Yoav Goldberg, Ryan Cotterell
Abstract
The representation space of neural models for textual data emerges in an unsupervised manner during training. Understanding how human-interpretable concepts, such as gender, are encoded in these representations would improve the ability of users to control the content of these representations and analyze the working of the models that rely on them. One prominent approach to the control problem is the identification and removal of linear concept subspaces – subspaces in the representation space that correspond to a given concept. While those are tractable and interpretable, neural network do not necessarily represent concepts in linear subspaces. We propose a kernelization of the recently-proposed linear concept-removal objective, and show that it is effective in guarding against the ability of certain nonlinear adversaries to recover the concept. Interestingly, our findings suggest that the division between linear and nonlinear models is overly simplistic: when considering the concept of binary gender and its neutralization, we do not find a single kernel space that exclusively contains all the concept-related information. It is therefore challenging to protect against all nonlinear adversaries at once.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d04a0d02-e8b7-48cf-b730-a35cd3434ca7Cited by top-tier papers21
- LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formNora Belrose, David Schneider-Joseph, Shauli Ravfogel, Ryan Cotterell et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 305 citations
- In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few-Shot UnlearnersMartin Pawelczyk, Seth Neel, Himabindu LakkarajuICML 2024 · 217 citations
- Probing for the Usage of Grammatical NumberKarim Lasri, Tiago Pimentel, Alessandro Lenci, Thierry Poibeau et al.ACL 2022 · 72 citations
- Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and DetectionAbhinav Kumar, Chenhao Tan, Amit SharmaNeurIPS 2022 · 46 citations
- Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine SteeringShashwat Singh, Shauli Ravfogel, Jonathan Herzig, Roee Aharoni et al.ICML 2024 · 36 citations
Builds on3
- Linear Adversarial Concept ErasureShauli Ravfogel, Michael Twiton, Yoav Goldberg, Ryan CotterellICML 2022 · 89 citations
- On the Global Optima of Kernelized Adversarial Representation LearningBashir Sadeghi, Runyi Yu, Vishnu BoddetiICCV 2019 · 34 citations
- Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace ProjectionShauli Ravfogel, Yanai Elazar, Hila Gonen, Michael Twiton et al.ACL 2020 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Linear Guardedness and its ImplicationsShauli Ravfogel, Yoav Goldberg, Ryan CotterellACL 2023 · 2 citations
- Preserving Task-Relevant Information Under Linear Concept RemovalFloris Holstege, Shauli Ravfogel, Bram WoutersNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Obliviator Reveals the Cost of Nonlinear Guardedness in Concept ErasureRamin Akbari, Milad Afshari, Vishnu BoddetiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Prototype-Guided Concept Erasure in Diffusion ModelsYuze Cai, Jiahao Lu, Hongxiang Shi, Yichao Zhou et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Removing Spurious Concepts from Neural Network Representations via Joint Subspace EstimationFloris Holstege, Bram Wouters, Noud P. A. van Giersbergen, Cees G. H. DiksICML 2024 · 3 citations
