Addressing Concept Mislabeling in Concept Bottleneck Models Through Preference Optimization
Emiliano Penaloza, Tianyue H. Zhang, Laurent Charlin, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga
Abstract
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) propose to enhance the trustworthiness of AI systems by constraining their decisions on a set of humanunderstandable concepts. However, CBMs typically assume that datasets contains accurate concept labels-an assumption often violated in practice, which we show can significantly degrade performance (by 25% in some cases). To address this, we introduce the Concept Preference Optimization (CPO) objective, a new loss function based on Direct Preference Optimization, which effectively mitigates the negative impact of concept mislabeling on CBM performance. We provide an analysis on some key properties of the CPO objective showing it directly optimizes for the concept's posterior distribution, and contrast it against Binary Cross Entropy (BCE) where we show CPO is inherently less sensitive to concept noise. We empirically confirm our analysis finding that CPO consistently outperforms BCE in three real-world datasets with and without added label noise. We make our code available on Github 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d02953f9-88f8-4105-9af5-2d2012e105d0Cited by top-tier papers2
- Partially Shared Concept Bottleneck ModelsDelong Zhao, Qiang Huang, Di Yan, Yiqun Sun et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- CB-SLICE: Concept-Based Interpretable Error Slice DiscoveryYael Konforti, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Elaf Almahmoud, Mateja JamnikICML 2026
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural NetworksChih-Kuan Yeh, Been Kim, Sercan Ömer Arik, Chun-Liang Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 390 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
Related papers
- Auxiliary Losses for Learning Generalizable Concept-based ModelsIvaxi Sheth, Samira Ebrahimi KahouNeurIPS 2023 · 52 citations
- Addressing Leakage in Concept Bottleneck ModelsMarton Havasi, Sonali Parbhoo, Finale Doshi-VelezNeurIPS 2022 · 163 citations
- Credal Concept Bottleneck Models for Epistemic-Aleatoric Uncertainty DecompositionTanmoy Mukherjee, Thomas Bailleux, Pierre Marquis, Zied BouraouiACL 2026
- Semi-Supervised Concept Bottleneck ModelsLijie Hu, Tianhao Huang, Huanyi Xie, Xilin Gong et al.ICCV 2025 · 4 citations
- Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-OffMateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Pietro Barbiero, Gabriele Ciravegna, Giuseppe Marra et al.NeurIPS 2022
