Teleportation Destination Previews Support Memory Retention During Virtual Navigation
Zubin Datta Choudhary, Ferran Argelaguet, Gerd Bruder, Greg Welch
Abstract
Teleportation is one of the most widely used locomotion techniques in virtual reality (VR) because it is efficient, minimizes motion sickness, and enables large-scale spatial traversal with minimal effort. However, research on the Doorway Effect shows that spatial transitions can impair memory of information encountered just before the transition. Event Segmentation Theory (EST) explains this by proposing that salient changes disrupt a person’s working memory representation, causing recently encoded information to be replaced and reducing its availability for retrieval. By extension, the design of spatial transitions in VR may influence whether memory is disrupted or preserved, which could be a consideration in applied contexts such as education and training. One way to mitigate such impairment is to provide predictive cues about the upcoming change to reduce disruption. In VR, this can be implemented through teleportation previews, which give users a glimpse of the destination before arrival. In this experiment, we adapted the Doorway Effect paradigm to examine how two teleportation design factors — preview availability and environmental change — affect memory. Using a within-subjects 2 × 2 design (N = 27), participants studied a set of 3D objects, then teleported either within the same environment or into a different one, with or without a preview of the destination. After each transition, they completed a visual recognition task. Results showed two key findings: (1) without previews, recognition declined when teleporting into a different environment compared to remaining in the same one, and (2) when transitioning between different environments, providing a preview improved recognition relative to no preview. Together, these results indicate that both the distinctiveness of environments and the availability of previews shape memory during VR transitions. We discuss how these findings align with EST, highlight the cognitive consequences of teleportation design, and provide guidance for designing transitions that better support memory in applied contexts such as education and training.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get cffd4040-06c3-4ad9-8660-802f40a4d7caRelated papers
- Doorways Do Not Always Cause Forgetting: Studying the Effect of Locomotion Technique and Doorway Visualization in Virtual RealityThomas Van Gemert, Sean Chew, Yiannis Kalaitzoglou, Joanna BergströmCHI 2024 · 6 citations
- Preview Teleport: An Occlusion-Free Point-and-Teleport Technique Enhanced with an Augmented PreviewYen-Ming Huang, Tzu-Wei Mi, Li-Wei ChanIEEE VR 2025 · 9 citations
- Portals in Impossible VR Spaces: A Taxonomy and Effects on Spatial MemoryAna Rita Rebelo, Khrystyna Vasylevska, Hannes Kaufmann, Rui NóbregaIEEE VR 2026
- Designing for Wayfinding in VR: Linking Navigation Interfaces to Spatial Learning and Cognitive MappingArmin Mostafavi, Zhiwen Qiu, Tong Bill Xu, Wenqian Niu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Walking-with-Portals vs. Teleport in VR: Why Walking and Portals Matter in Small SpacesAna Rita Rebelo, Pedro A. Ferreira, André Tomás Ribeiro, Rui NóbregaACM MM 2025 · 1 citation
