LOPT: Learning Optimal Pigovian Tax in Sequential Social Dilemmas
Yun Hua, Shang Gao, Wenhao Li, Haosheng Chen, Bo Jin, Xiangfeng Wang, Jun Luo, Hongyuan Zha
Abstract
In multi-agent reinforcement learning, each agent acts to maximize its individual accumulated rewards. Nevertheless, individual accumulated rewards could not fully reflect how others perceive them, resulting in selfish behaviors that undermine global performance. The externality theory, defined as the activities of one economic actor affect the activities of another in ways that are not reflected in market transactions,'' is applicable to analyze the social dilemmas in MARL. One of its most profound non-market solutions, Pigovian Tax'', which internalizes externalities by taxing those who create negative externalities and subsidizing those who create positive externalities, could aid in developing a mechanism to resolve MARL's social dilemmas. The purpose of this paper is to apply externality theory to analyze social dilemmas in MARL. To internalize the externalities in MARL, the Learning Optimal Pigovian Tax method (LOPT), is proposed, where an additional agent is introduced to learn the tax/allowance allocation policy so as to approximate the optimal Pigovian Tax'' which accurately reflects the externalities for all agents. Furthermore, a reward shaping mechanism based on the approximated optimal Pigovian Tax'' is applied to reduce the social cost of each agent and tries to alleviate the social dilemmas. Compared with existing state-of-the-art methods, the proposed LOPT leads to higher collective social welfare in both the Escape Room and the Cleanup environments, which shows the superiority of our method in solving social dilemmas.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cfcb5ae1-6f89-493e-a7ce-4705b2d431eeBuilds on6
- Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTabish Rashid, Gregory Farquhar, Bei Peng, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,960 citations
- Learning to Incentivize Other Learning AgentsJiachen Yang, Ang Li, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Peter Sunehag et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 105 citations
- Information Design in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYue Lin, Wenhao Li, Hongyuan Zha, Baoxiang WangNeurIPS 2023 · 25 citations
- ConcaveQ: Non-monotonic Value Function Factorization via Concave Representations in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningHuiqun Li, Hanhan Zhou, Yifei Zou, Dongxiao Yu et al.AAAI 2024 · 18 citations
- STAS: Spatial-Temporal Return Decomposition for Solving Sparse Rewards Problems in Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningSirui Chen, Zhaowei Zhang, Yaodong Yang, Yali DuAAAI 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight RationalityAntoine Scheid, Aymeric Capitaine, Etienne Boursier, Eric Moulines et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Model-Free Opponent ShapingChristopher Lu, Timon Willi, Christian A. Schröder de Witt, Jakob N. FoersterICML 2022 · 53 citations
- Learning to Share in Networked Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningYuxuan Yi, Ge Li, Yaowei Wang, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Self-Play Q-Learners Can Provably Collude in the Iterated Prisoner's DilemmaQuentin Bertrand, Juan Agustin Duque, Emilio Calvano, Gauthier GidelICML 2025
- Reciprocal Reward Influence Encourages Cooperation From Self-Interested AgentsJohn L. Zhou, Weizhe Hong, Jonathan C. KaoNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
