Lune

CRYPTO2020Top-tier venue

Always Have a Backup Plan: Fully Secure Synchronous MPC with Asynchronous Fallback

Erica Blum, Chen-Da Liu Zhang, Julian Loss

2020Year
36Citations
6Top-tier citations

Abstract

Protocols for secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) can be classified according to the underlying communication model. Two prominent communication models considered in the literature are the synchronous and asynchronous models, which considerably differ in terms of the achievable security guarantees. Synchronous MPC protocols can achieve the optimal corruption threshold n/2n/2 and allow every party to give input, but become completely insecure when synchrony assumptions are violated. On the other hand, asynchronous MPC protocols remain secure under arbitrary network conditions, but can tolerate only n/3n/3 corruptions and parties with slow connections unavoidably cannot give input.

A natural question is whether there exists a protocol for MPC that can tolerate up to ts<n/2t_s < n/2 corruptions under a synchronous network and ta<n/3t_a < n/3 corruptions even when the network is asynchronous. We answer this question by showing tight feasibility and impossibility results. More specifically, we show that such a protocol exists if and only if ta+2ts<nt_a + 2t_s < n and the number of inputs taken into account under an asynchronous network is at most n−tsn-t_s.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get cfb63cd8-43c2-453d-a9df-74c9e7d0ecdc

Cited by top-tier papers6

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines