Revamping Federated Learning Security from a Defender's Perspective: A Unified Defense with Homomorphic Encrypted Data Space
K. Naveen Kumar, Reshmi Mitra, C. Krishna Mohan
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) facilitates clients to collaborate on training a shared machine learning model without exposing individual private data. Nonetheless, FL remains susceptible to utility and privacy attacks, notably evasion data poisoning and model inversion attacks, compromising the system's efficiency and data privacy. Existing FL defenses are often specialized to a particular single attack, lacking generality and a comprehensive defender's perspective. To address these challenges, we introduce Federated Cryptography Defense (FCD), a unified single framework aligning with the defender's perspective. FCD employs row-wise transposition cipher based data encryption with a secret key to counter both evasion black-box data poisoning and model inversion attacks. The crux of FCD lies in transferring the entire learning process into an encrypted data space and using a novel distillation loss guided by the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. This measure compares the probability distributions of the local pretrained teacher model's predictions on normal data and the local student model's predictions on the same data in FCD's encrypted form. By working within this encrypted space, FCD eliminates the need for decryption at the server, resulting in reduced computational complexity. We demonstrate the practical feasibility of FCD and apply it to defend against evasion utility attack on benchmark datasets (GTSRB, KBTS, CIFAR10, and EMNIST). We further extend FCD for defending against model inversion attack in split FL on the CI-FAR100 dataset. Our experiments across the diverse attack and FL settings demonstrate practical feasibility and robustness against utility evasion (impact > 30) and privacy attacks (MSE > 73) compared to the second best method.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID DataXiang Li, Kaixuan Huang, Wenhao Yang, Shusen Wang et al.ICLR 2020 · 2,930 citations
- BatchCrypt: Efficient Homomorphic Encryption for Cross-Silo Federated LearningChengliang Zhang, Suyi Li, Junzhe Xia, Wei Wang et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 967 citations
- Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated LearningVirat Shejwalkar, Amir Houmansadr, Peter Kairouz, Daniel RamageS&P 2022 · 302 citations
- Neural Network Inversion in Adversarial Setting via Background Knowledge AlignmentZiqi Yang, Jiyi Zhang, Ee-Chien Chang, Zhenkai LiangCCS 2019 · 257 citations
- ResSFL: A Resistance Transfer Framework for Defending Model Inversion Attack in Split Federated LearningJingtao Li, Adnan Siraj Rakin, Xing Chen, Zhezhi He et al.CVPR 2022 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Soteria: Provable Defense Against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning From Representation PerspectiveJingwei Sun, Ang Li, Binghui Wang, Huanrui Yang et al.CVPR 2021
- FedInv: Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning by Inversing Local Model UpdatesBo Zhao, Peng Sun, Tao Wang, Keyu JiangAAAI 2022 · 82 citations
- Enhancing Privacy Preservation in Federated Learning via Learning Rate PerturbationGuangnian Wan, Haitao Du, Xuejing Yuan, Jun Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 2 citations
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
- SVDefense: Effective Defense against Gradient Inversion Attacks via Singular Value DecompositionChenxiang Luo, David K. Y. Yau, Qun SongNDSS 2026 · 3 citations
