Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms for Causal Structure and Representation Learning
Patrik Reizinger, Siyuan Guo, Ferenc Huszár, Bernhard Schölkopf, Wieland Brendel
Abstract
Identifying latent representations or causal structures is important for good generalization and downstream task performance. However, both fields developed rather independently. We observe that several structure and representation identifiability methods, particularly those that require multiple environments, rely on exchangeable non-i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) data. To formalize this connection, we propose the Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms (IEM) framework to unify key representation and causal structure learning methods. IEM provides a unified probabilistic graphical model encompassing causal discovery, Independent Component Analysis, and Causal Representation Learning. With the help of the IEM model, we generalize the Causal de Finetti theorem of Guo et al. (2024a) by relaxing the necessary conditions for causal structure identification in exchangeable data. We term these conditions cause and mechanism variability, and show how they imply a duality condition in identifiable representation learning, leading to new identifiability results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf7d408d-dcba-43a2-ad01-c7bdc424210eCited by top-tier papers5
- Do Finetti: On Causal Effects for Exchangeable DataSiyuan Guo, Chi Zhang, Karthika Mohan, Ferenc Huszar et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- On the Value of Cross-Modal Misalignment in Multimodal Representation LearningYichao Cai, Yuhang Liu, Erdun Gao, Tianjiao Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergenceMoritz Miller, Bernhard Schölkopf, Siyuan GuoNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- From Isolation to Entanglement: When Do Interpretability Methods Identify and Disentangle Known Concepts?Aaron Mueller, Andrew Lee, Shruti Joshi, Ekdeep Singh Lubana et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Skill Learning via Policy Diversity Yields Identifiable Representations for Reinforcement LearningPatrik Reizinger, Bálint Mucsányi, Siyuan Guo, Benjamin Eysenbach et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on23
- Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from StyleJulius von Kügelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 421 citations
- Gradient-Based Neural DAG LearningSébastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, Simon Lacoste-JulienICLR 2020 · 337 citations
- Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating ProcessRoland S. Zimmermann, Yash Sharma, Steffen Schneider, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2021 · 264 citations
- Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse CodingDavid A. Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov et al.ICLR 2021 · 156 citations
- Interventional Causal Representation LearningKartik Ahuja, Divyat Mahajan, Yixin Wang, Yoshua BengioICML 2023 · 143 citations
Related papers
- Causal de Finetti: On the Identification of Invariant Causal Structure in Exchangeable DataSiyuan Guo, Viktor Tóth, Bernhard Schölkopf, Ferenc HuszarNeurIPS 2023 · 57 citations
- Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?Luigi Gresele, Julius von Kügelgen, Vincent Stimper, Bernhard Schölkopf et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 133 citations
- Causal Component AnalysisWendong Liang, Armin Kekic, Julius von Kügelgen, Simon Buchholz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 65 citations
- On the identifiability of causal graphs with multiple environmentsFrancesco MontagnaICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Unpaired Multi-Domain Causal Representation LearningNils Sturma, Chandler Squires, Mathias Drton, Caroline UhlerNeurIPS 2023 · 43 citations
