GREATS: Online Selection of High-Quality Data for LLM Training in Every Iteration
Jiachen T. Wang, Tong Wu, Dawn Song, Prateek Mittal, Ruoxi Jia
Abstract
Online batch selection methods offer an adaptive alternative to static training data selection by dynamically selecting data batches during training. However, existing methods either rely on impractical reference models or simple heuristics that may not capture true data informativeness. To address these limitations, we propose GREedy Approximation Taylor Selection (GREATS), a principled and efficient online batch selection method that applies greedy algorithm to optimize the data batch quality approximated by Taylor expansion. We develop a series of techniques to scale GREATS to large-scale model training. Extensive experiments with large language models (LLMs) demonstrate that GREATS significantly improves training convergence speed and generalization performance. Our codebase is publically available at https://github.com/Jiachen-T-Wang/GREATS .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf27985b-3af5-4d11-8a3a-db522d5ef45fCited by top-tier papers24
- Improving Data Efficiency for LLM Reinforcement Fine-tuning Through Difficulty-targeted Online Data Selection and Rollout ReplayYifan Sun, Jingyan Shen, Yibin Wang, Tianyu Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 63 citations
- ReasonFlux-PRM: Trajectory-Aware PRMs for Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMsJiaru Zou, Ling Yang, Jingwen Gu, Jiahao Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 51 citations
- FlyLoRA: Boosting Task Decoupling and Parameter Efficiency via Implicit Rank-Wise Mixture-of-ExpertsHeming Zou, Yunliang Zang, Wutong Xu, Yao Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 38 citations
- DataRater: Meta-Learned Dataset CurationDan Andrei Calian, Gregory Farquhar, Iurii Kemaev, Luisa M. Zintgraf et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- LEAD: Iterative Data Selection for Efficient LLM Instruction TuningXiaotian Lin, Yanlin Qi, Yizhang Zhu, Themis Palpanas et al.VLDB 2026 · 16 citations
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
Related papers
- Diversified Batch Selection for Training AccelerationFeng Hong, Yueming Lyu, Jiangchao Yao, Ya Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 16 citations
- LLM Data Selection and Utilization via Dynamic Bi-level OptimizationYang Yu, Kai Han, Hang Zhou, Yehui Tang et al.ICML 2025
- Rethinking Data Curation in LLM Training: Online Reweighting Offers Better Generalization than Offline MethodsWanru Zhao, Yihong Chen, Yuzhi Tang, Wentao Ma et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Small Generalizable Prompt Predictive Models Can Steer Efficient RL Post-Training of Large Reasoning ModelsYun Qu, Qi Wang, Yixiu Mao, Heming Zou et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- A Critical Look at Targeted Instruction Selection: Disentangling What Matters (and What Doesn’t)Nihal Nayak, Paula Rodriguez-Diaz, Neha Hulkund, Sara Beery et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
