Mitigating Partial Observability in Sequential Decision Processes via the Lambda Discrepancy
Cameron Allen, Aaron Kirtland, Ruo Yu Tao, Sam Lobel, Daniel Scott, Nicholas Petrocelli, Omer Gottesman, Ronald Parr, Michael L. Littman, George Konidaris
Abstract
Reinforcement learning algorithms typically rely on the assumption that the environment dynamics and value function can be expressed in terms of a Markovian state representation. However, when state information is only partially observable, how can an agent learn such a state representation, and how can it detect when it has found one? We introduce a metric that can accomplish both objectives, without requiring access to -- or knowledge of -- an underlying, unobservable state space. Our metric, the -discrepancy, is the difference between two distinct temporal difference (TD) value estimates, each computed using TD() with a different value of . Since TD() makes an implicit Markov assumption and TD() does not, a discrepancy between these estimates is a potential indicator of a non-Markovian state representation. Indeed, we prove that the -discrepancy is exactly zero for all Markov decision processes and almost always non-zero for a broad class of partially observable environments. We also demonstrate empirically that, once detected, minimizing the -discrepancy can help with learning a memory function to mitigate the corresponding partial observability. We then train a reinforcement learning agent that simultaneously constructs two recurrent value networks with different parameters and minimizes the difference between them as an auxiliary loss. The approach scales to challenging partially observable domains, where the resulting agent frequently performs significantly better (and never performs worse) than a baseline recurrent agent with only a single value network.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf1d7c32-0027-4b61-8ff0-bd775d04b139Cited by top-tier papers3
- Commit to the Bit: Reactive Reinforcement Learning Done RightOnno Eberhard, Claire Vernade, Michael MuehlebachICML 2026
- Partially Observable Reinforcement Learning with Memory TracesOnno Eberhard, Michael Muehlebach, Claire VernadeICML 2025
- RefactorBench: Evaluating Stateful Reasoning in Language Agents Through CodeDhruv Gautam, Spandan Garg, Jinu Jang, Neel Sundaresan et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on5
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPsTianwei Ni, Benjamin Eysenbach, Ruslan SalakhutdinovICML 2022 · 162 citations
- Discovered Policy OptimisationChris Lu, Jakub Grudzien Kuba, Alistair Letcher, Luke Metz et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 134 citations
- Learning Markov State Abstractions for Deep Reinforcement LearningCameron Allen, Neev Parikh, Omer Gottesman, George KonidarisNeurIPS 2021 · 66 citations
- Jumanji: a Diverse Suite of Scalable Reinforcement Learning Environments in JAXClément Bonnet, Daniel Luo, Donal Byrne, Shikha Surana et al.ICLR 2024 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Discerning Temporal Difference LearningJianfei MaAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
- Variational Recurrent Models for Solving Partially Observable Control TasksDongqi Han, Kenji Doya, Jun TaniICLR 2020 · 75 citations
- Provable Representation with Efficient Planning for Partially Observable Reinforcement LearningHongming Zhang, Tongzheng Ren, Chenjun Xiao, Dale Schuurmans et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Reinforcement Learning in Reward-Mixing MDPsJeongyeol Kwon, Yonathan Efroni, Constantine Caramanis, Shie MannorNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- Learning Belief Representations for Partially Observable Deep RLAndrew Wang, Andrew C. Li, Toryn Q. Klassen, Rodrigo Toro Icarte et al.ICML 2023 · 21 citations
