Learning Expected Emphatic Traces for Deep RL
Ray Jiang, Shangtong Zhang, Veronica Chelu, Adam White, Hado van Hasselt
Abstract
Off-policy sampling and experience replay are key for improving sample efficiency and scaling model-free temporal difference learning methods. When combined with function approximation, such as neural networks, this combination is known as the deadly triad and is potentially unstable. Recently, it has been shown that stability and good performance at scale can be achieved by combining emphatic weightings and multi-step updates. This approach, however, is generally limited to sampling complete trajectories in order, to compute the required emphatic weighting. In this paper we investigate how to combine emphatic weightings with non-sequential, off-line data sampled from a replay buffer. We develop a multi-step emphatic weighting that can be combined with replay, and a time-reversed n-step TD learning algorithm to learn the required emphatic weighting. We show that these state weightings reduce variance compared with prior approaches, while providing convergence guarantees. We tested the approach at scale on Atari 2600 video games, and observed that the new X-ETD(n) agent improved over baseline agents, highlighting both the scalability and broad applicability of our approach. Many deep reinforcement learning systems are not sample efficient. A simple and effective way to improve sample efficiency is to make better use of prior experience via replay (
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ceec5f79-1ac6-4929-8e5e-9ac99cd41c01Cited by top-tier papers4
- Correcting discount-factor mismatch in on-policy policy gradient methodsFengdi Che, Gautham Vasan, A. Rupam MahmoodICML 2023 · 10 citations
- The Pitfalls of Regularization in Off-Policy TD LearningGaurav Manek, J. Zico KolterNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- PER-ETD: A Polynomially Efficient Emphatic Temporal Difference Learning MethodZiwei Guan, Tengyu Xu, Yingbin LiangICLR 2022 · 5 citations
- Adaptive Interest for Emphatic Reinforcement LearningMartin Klissarov, Rasool Fakoor, Jonas W. Mueller, Kavosh Asadi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 3 citations
Builds on10
- Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy EvaluationMasatoshi Uehara, Jiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 199 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation via the Regularized LagrangianMengjiao Yang, Ofir Nachum, Bo Dai, Lihong Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 125 citations
- GradientDICE: Rethinking Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary ValuesShangtong Zhang, Bo Liu, Shimon WhitesonICML 2020 · 107 citations
- A Self-Tuning Actor-Critic AlgorithmTom Zahavy, Zhongwen Xu, Vivek Veeriah, Matteo Hessel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 106 citations
- Muesli: Combining Improvements in Policy OptimizationMatteo Hessel, Ivo Danihelka, Fabio Viola, Arthur Guez et al.ICML 2021 · 69 citations
Related papers
- Emphatic Algorithms for Deep Reinforcement LearningRay Jiang, Tom Zahavy, Zhongwen Xu, Adam White et al.ICML 2021 · 22 citations
- Fixed-Horizon Temporal Difference Methods for Stable Reinforcement LearningKristopher De Asis, Alan Chan, Silviu Pitis, Richard S. Sutton et al.AAAI 2020 · 34 citations
- Revisiting a Design Choice in Gradient Temporal Difference LearningXiaochi Qian, Shangtong ZhangICLR 2025
- Why Target Networks Stabilise Temporal Difference MethodsMattie Fellows, Matthew J. A. Smith, Shimon WhitesonICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Averaging n-step Returns Reduces Variance in Reinforcement LearningBrett Daley, Martha White, Marlos C. MachadoICML 2024 · 7 citations
