Towards Reward Fairness in RLHF: From a Resource Allocation Perspective
Sheng Ouyang, Yulan Hu, Ge Chen, Qingyang Li, Fuzheng Zhang, Yong Liu
Abstract
Rewards serve as proxies for human preferences and play a crucial role in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). However, if these rewards are inherently imperfect, exhibiting various biases, they can adversely affect the alignment of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we collectively define the various biases present in rewards as the problem of reward unfairness. We propose a bias-agnostic method to address the issue of reward fairness from a resource allocation perspective, without specifically designing for each type of bias, yet effectively mitigating them. Specifically, we model preference learning as a resource allocation problem, treating rewards as resources to be allocated while considering the trade-off between utility and fairness in their distribution. We propose two methods, Fairness Regularization and Fairness Coefficient, to achieve fairness in rewards. We apply our methods in both verification and reinforcement learning scenarios to obtain a fairness reward model and a policy model, respectively. Experiments conducted in these scenarios demonstrate that our approach aligns LLMs with human preferences in a more fair manner. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/ shoyua/Towards-Reward-Fairness .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cee88c04-3556-4bbd-9966-c91c375badc4Cited by top-tier papers3
- AudioTrust: Benchmarking The Multifaceted Trustworthiness of Audio Large Language ModelsKai Li, Can Shen, Yile Liu, Jirui Han et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Self-correcting for Debiasing Large Language ModelsXuan Feng, Shuai Zhao, Luwei Xiao, Tianlong Gu et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Graph-Preference Learning: Debiasing Network-Sampled Human Feedback for Target Welfare EstimationGuangrui Fan, DanDan Liu, AZNUL SABRI, Pan LihuICML 2026
Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMsRui Yang, Ruomeng Ding, Yong Lin, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 157 citations
- Decoding-time Realignment of Language ModelsTianlin Liu, Shangmin Guo, Leonardo Bianco, Daniele Calandriello et al.ICML 2024 · 69 citations
- Alignment Tampering: How Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback Is Exploited to Optimize Misaligned BiasesDongyoon Hahm, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Kimin LeeICML 2026
- T-REG: Preference Optimization with Token-Level Reward RegularizationWenxuan Zhou, Shujian Zhang, Lingxiao Zhao, Tao MengACL 2025 · 11 citations
- A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language ModelsSuhwan Kim, Taehyun Cho, Youngsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim et al.ICML 2026
