Random Search Neural Networks for Efficient and Expressive Graph Learning
Michael Ito, Danai Koutra, Jenna Wiens
Abstract
Random walk neural networks (RWNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for graph representation learning, leveraging recent advances in sequence models to process random walks. However, under realistic sampling constraints, RWNNs often fail to capture global structure even in small graphs due to incomplete node and edge coverage, limiting their expressivity. To address this, we propose random search neural networks (RSNNs), which operate on random searches, each of which guarantees full node coverage. Theoretically, we demonstrate that in sparse graphs, only searches are needed to achieve full edge coverage, substantially reducing sampling complexity compared to the walks required by RWNNs (assuming walk lengths scale with graph size). Furthermore, when paired with universal sequence models, RSNNs are universal approximators. We lastly show RSNNs are probabilistically invariant to graph isomorphisms, ensuring their expectation is an isomorphism-invariant graph function. Empirically, RSNNs consistently outperform RWNNs on molecular and protein benchmarks, achieving comparable or superior performance with up to 16 fewer sampled sequences. Our work bridges theoretical and practical advances in random walk based approaches, offering an efficient and expressive framework for learning on sparse graphs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cece0c58-3a75-4a25-bb12-596cee62ac80Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph TransformerLadislav Rampásek, Michael Galkin, Vijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,216 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
Related papers
- Revisiting Random Walks for Learning on GraphsJinwoo Kim, Olga Zaghen, Ayhan Suleymanzade, Youngmin Ryou et al.ICLR 2025
- Non-convolutional graph neural networksYuanqing Wang, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- PF-GNN: Differentiable particle filtering based approximation of universal graph representationsMohammed Haroon Dupty, Yanfei Dong, Wee Sun LeeICLR 2022 · 14 citations
- On the Universality of Graph Neural Networks on Large Random GraphsNicolas Keriven, Alberto Bietti, Samuel VaiterNeurIPS 2021 · 29 citations
- Rethinking the Power of Graph Canonization in Graph Representation Learning with StabilityZehao Dong, Muhan Zhang, Philip R. O. Payne, Michael A. Province et al.ICLR 2024 · 1 citation
