IM Receptivity and Presentation-type Preferences among Users of a Mobile App with Automated Receptivity-status Adjustment
Ting-Wei Wu, Yu-Ling Chien, Hao-Ping Lee, Yung-Ju Chang
Abstract
Researchers have long attempted to estimate instant-messaging (IM) users’ attentiveness, responsiveness, and interruptibility. Yet, IM users’ self-presentation of their receptivity, and their perceptions of automated adjustment/revelation of their receptivity status (e.g., Facebook Messenger’s green dot that deems a user to be “active”), remain under-explored. We therefore told our 43 participants that our IM app, IMStatus, was capable of automatically estimating and adjusting their receptivity status to responsive, attentive, or interruptible based on their smartphone activity. These statuses were also presented to their IM contacts in three different styles. Over a two-week period, the participants rarely chose the status interruptible, and when they did, it was usually to indicate low availability. Textual presentation was usually chosen to express statuses precisely, especially at high and low extremes of receptivity; while graphical and numeric presentations were preferred when self-perceived receptivity levels were more ambiguous. Conflicts between recipients’ and senders’ perspectives are also discussed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ce7f85f3-e23c-4ccd-9eb0-565f9cdca61aCited by top-tier papers3
- Revisiting Piggyback Prototyping: Examining Benefits and Tradeoffs in Extending Existing Social Computing SystemsDaniel A. Epstein, Fannie Liu, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Dennis WangCSCW 2022 · 14 citations
- Multiple Device Users' Actual and Ideal Cross-Device Usage for Multi-Stage Notification-Interactions: An ESM Study Addressing the Usage Gap and Impacts of Device ContextFang-Ching Tseng, Zih-Yun Chiou, Ho-Hsuan Chuang, Li-Ting Su et al.CHI 2023 · 10 citations
- Pinning, Sorting, and Categorizing Notifications: A Mixed-methods Usage and Experience Study of Mobile Notification-management FeaturesYong-Han Lin, Li-Ting Su, Uei-Dar Chen, Yi-Chi Lee et al.UbiComp 2024 · 7 citations
Builds on4
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Exploring the Design Space of User-System Communication for Smart-home Routine AssistantsYi-Shyuan Chiang, Ruei-Che Chang, Yi-Lin Chuang, Shih-Ya Chou et al.CHI 2020 · 35 citations
- I Share, You Care: Private Status Sharing and Sender-Controlled Notifications in Mobile Instant MessagingHyunsung Cho, Jinyoung Oh, Juho Kim, Sung-Ju LeeCSCW 2020 · 19 citations
- User Experiences with Online Status IndicatorsCamille Cobb, Lucy Simko, Tadayoshi Kohno, Alexis HinikerCHI 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Because I'm Restricted, 2 - 4 PM Unable to See Messages: Exploring Users' Perceptions and Likely Practices around Exposing Attention Management Use on IM Online StatusYu-Ling Chou, Yu-Ling Chien, Yu-Hsin Lin, Kung-Pai Lin et al.CHI 2022 · 13 citations
- Why Did You/I Read but Not Reply? IM Users' Unresponded-to Read-receipt Practices and Explanations of ThemYu-Ling Chou, Yi-Hsiu Lin, Tzu-Yi Lin, Hsin Ying You et al.CHI 2022 · 15 citations
- A Multi-perspective Analysis of Social Context and Personal Factors in Office Settings for the Design of an Effective Mobile Notification SystemSeyma Kucukozer Cavdar, Tugba Taskaya Temizel, Mirco Musolesi, Peter TiñoUbiComp 2020 · 15 citations
- Exploring Immersive Interpersonal Communication via ARKyungjun Lee, Hong Li, Muhammad Rizky Wellyanto, Yu Jiang Tham et al.CSCW 2023 · 7 citations
- "Together but not together": Evaluating Typing Indicators for Interaction-Rich CommunicationZainab Iftikhar, Yumeng Ma, Jeff HuangCHI 2023 · 14 citations
