Understanding and Optimizing Database Pushdown on Disaggregated Storage
Hua Zhang, Xiao Li, Yuebin Bai, Ming Liu
Abstract
Database pushdown is a widely adopted technique under compute-storage disaggregation. The rising network and I/O speeds, coupled with stagnated compute and memory subsystems of a disaggregated storage architecture in the past decade, render state-of-the-art policy-driven pushdown designs ineffective. This is because the query performance bottleneck has shifted from network and I/O to compute, where computing power at the storage layer becomes scarce.
This paper rethinks pushdown database design via a systematic characterization and identifies three root causes, i.e., table structure agnostic, lower interference tolerance, and lack of operator scheduling. Based on the gathered insights, we build TapDB, a new pushdown database that targets emerging storage disaggregation. Driven by two key ideas (i.e., lazy evaluation and trading network and I/O for compute), TapDB introduces four new mechanisms: a table-aware operator cost estimator based on in-situ meta-learning and cardinality estimation, an admission control scheme to limit execution concurrency, a ballooning-based DRAM-SSD hybrid table, and a critical path-driven operator scheduler. Our prototype shows 1.3-2.3× speedups compared with prior solutions when running SSB and TPCH benchmarks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ce4dc4d1-a9bf-4286-9d69-53e9bef88192Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on44
- An End-to-End Learning-based Cost EstimatorJi Sun, Guoliang LiVLDB 2020 · 251 citations
- Jupiter evolving: transforming google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networkingLeon Poutievski, Omid Mashayekhi, Joon Ong, Arjun Singh et al.SIGCOMM 2022 · 230 citations
- When Cloud Storage Meets RDMAYixiao Gao, Qiang Li, Lingbo Tang, Yongqing Xi et al.NSDI 2021 · 228 citations
- ZNS: Avoiding the Block Interface Tax for Flash-based SSDsMatias Bjørling, Abutalib Aghayev, Hans Holmberg, Aravind Ramesh et al.USENIX ATC 2021 · 221 citations
- MatrixKV: Reducing Write Stalls and Write Amplification in LSM-tree Based KV Stores with Matrix Container in NVMTing Yao, Yiwen Zhang, Jiguang Wan, Qiu Cui et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 186 citations
Related papers
- FlexPushdownDB: Hybrid Pushdown and Caching in a Cloud DBMSYifei Yang, Matt Youill, Matthew E. Woicik, Yizhou Liu et al.VLDB 2021 · 67 citations
- Understanding the Performance Implications of the Design Principles in Storage-Disaggregated DatabasesXi Pang, Jianguo WangSIGMOD 2024 · 19 citations
- Optimizing Data-intensive Systems in Disaggregated Data Centers with TELEPORTQizhen Zhang, Xinyi Chen, Sidharth Sankhe, Zhilei Zheng et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 28 citations
- Understanding the Effect of Data Center Resource Disaggregation on Production DBMSsQizhen Zhang, Yifan Cai, Xinyi Chen, Sebastian Angel et al.VLDB 2020 · 64 citations
- Terark-DS: A High-Performance and Storage-Efficient Key-Value Separation Storage Engine on Disaggregated StorageJianshun Zhang, Xun Deng, Fang Wang, Jiaxin Ou et al.VLDB 2026
