FactKG: Fact Verification via Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs
Jiho Kim, Sungjin Park, Yeonsu Kwon, Yohan Jo, James Thorne, Edward Choi
Abstract
In real world applications, knowledge graphs (KG) are widely used in various domains (e.g. medical applications and dialogue agents). However, for fact verification, KGs have not been adequately utilized as a knowledge source. KGs can be a valuable knowledge source in fact verification due to their reliability and broad applicability. A KG consists of nodes and edges which makes it clear how concepts are linked together, allowing machines to reason over chains of topics. However, there are many challenges in understanding how these machine-readable concepts map to information in text. To enable the community to better use KGs, we introduce a new dataset, FACTKG: Fact Verification via Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs. It consists of 108k natural language claims with five types of reasoning: One-hop, Conjunction, Existence, Multi-hop, and Negation. Furthermore, FACTKG contains various linguistic patterns, including colloquial style claims as well as written style claims to increase practicality. Lastly, we develop a baseline approach and analyze FACTKG over these reasoning types. We believe FACTKG can advance both reliability and practicality in KG-based fact verification. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cdf842fd-1ca4-4843-a629-b0329e91a744Cited by top-tier papers22
- Benchmarking and Improving Large Vision-Language Models for Fundamental Visual Graph Understanding and ReasoningYingjie Zhu, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Yang Xiang et al.ACL 2025 · 15 citations
- Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models by Bayesian Sequential EstimationXiaohua Wang, Yuliang Yan, Longtao Huang, Xiaoqing Zheng et al.EMNLP 2023 · 12 citations
- OntoFact: Unveiling Fantastic Fact-Skeleton of LLMs via Ontology-Driven Reinforcement LearningZiyu Shang, Wenjun Ke, Nana Xiu, Peng Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Context-aware Inductive Knowledge Graph Completion with Latent Type Constraints and Subgraph ReasoningMuzhi Li, Cehao Yang, Chengjin Xu, Zixing Song et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- MultiHal: Multilingual Dataset for Knowledge-Graph Grounded Evaluation of LLM HallucinationsErnests Lavrinovics, Russa Biswas, Katja Hose, Johannes BjervaICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on5
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text ClassificationPepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, Isabelle AugensteinEMNLP 2020 · 158 citations
- Generating Fact Checking ExplanationsPepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, Isabelle AugensteinACL 2020 · 130 citations
- FaVIQ: FAct Verification from Information-seeking QuestionsJungsoo Park, Sewon Min, Jaewoo Kang, Luke Zettlemoyer et al.ACL 2022 · 47 citations
- Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health ClaimsNeema Kotonya, Francesca ToniEMNLP 2020 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Extending First-Order Logic for Factual Reasoning over Knowledge GraphsYuanzhen Hao, Desheng WuACL 2026
- CHECKWHY: Causal Fact Verification via Argument StructureJiasheng Si, Yibo Zhao, Yingjie Zhu, Haiyang Zhu et al.ACL 2024
- Fine-grained Fact Verification with Kernel Graph Attention NetworkZhenghao Liu, Chenyan Xiong, Maosong Sun, Zhiyuan LiuACL 2020 · 9 citations
- Causal Walk: Debiasing Multi-Hop Fact Verification with Front-Door AdjustmentCongzhi Zhang, Linhai Zhang, Deyu ZhouAAAI 2024 · 32 citations
- Few-Shot Knowledge Graph CompletionChuxu Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Chao Huang, Meng Jiang et al.AAAI 2020 · 238 citations
