USENIX Security2019Top-tier venue
On (The Lack Of) Location Privacy in Crowdsourcing Applications
Spyros Boukoros, Mathias Humbert, Stefan Katzenbeisser, Carmela Troncoso
Abstract
Crowdsourcing enables application developers to benefit from large and diverse datasets at a low cost. Specifically, mobile crowdsourcing (MCS) leverages users' devices as sensors to perform geo-located data collection. The collection of geo-located data though, raises serious privacy concerns for users. Yet, despite the large research body on location privacy-preserving mechanisms (LPPMs), MCS developers implement little to no protection for data collection or publication. To understand this mismatch, we study the performance of existing LPPMs on publicly available data from two mobile crowdsourcing projects. Our results show that well-established defenses are either not applicable or offer little protection in the MCS setting. Furthermore, they have a much stronger impact on applications' utility than foreseen in the literature. This is because existing LPPMs, designed with location-based services (LBSs) in mind, are optimized for utility functions based on users' locations, while MCS utility functions depend on the values (e.g., measurements) associated with those locations. We finally outline possible research avenues to facilitate the development of new location privacy solutions that fit the needs of MCS so that the increasing number of such applications do not jeopardize their users' privacy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cd4aa6f0-0e09-4f8d-89c8-6fc4ea9a43adCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- Knock Knock, Who's There? Membership Inference on Aggregate Location DataApostolos Pyrgelis, Carmela Troncoso, Emiliano De CristofaroNDSS 2018 · 293 citations
- Synthesizing Plausible Privacy-Preserving Location TracesVincent Bindschaedler, Reza ShokriS&P 2016 · 193 citations
- walk2friends: Inferring Social Links from Mobility ProfilesMichael Backes, Mathias Humbert, Jun Pang, Yang ZhangCCS 2017 · 123 citations
- Back to the Drawing Board: Revisiting the Design of Optimal Location Privacy-preserving MechanismsSimon Oya, Carmela Troncoso, Fernando Pérez-GonzálezCCS 2017 · 80 citations
- Analysis of Privacy Protections in Fitness Tracking Social Networks -or- You can run, but can you hide?Wajih Ul Hassan, Saad Hussain, Adam BatesUSENIX Security 2018 · 40 citations
Related papers
- EDEN: Enforcing Location Privacy through Re-identification Risk Assessment: A Federated Learning ApproachBesma Khalfoun, Sonia Ben Mokhtar, Sara Bouchenak, Vlad NituUbiComp 2021 · 23 citations
- Privacy-Preserving Online Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing: A Graph-based ApproachHengzhi Wang, En Wang, Yongjian Yang, Jie Wu et al.INFOCOM 2022 · 57 citations
- A Tale of Two Communities: Privacy of Third Party App Users in Crowdsourcing - The Case of Receipt TranscriptionWeiping Pei, Yanina Likhtenshteyn, Chuan YueCSCW 2023 · 1 citation
- User Motivations to Participate in Crowdsourcing and Contribute User-generated Content on Location-based Media: A Literature ReviewSamuli Laato, Sara Siqueira, Manuel F. Baer, Konstantinos Papangelis et al.CHI 2025 · 6 citations
- Differential Privacy for Directional DataBenjamin Weggenmann, Florian KerschbaumCCS 2021 · 18 citations
