Beyond Scores: Explainable Intelligent Assessment Strengthens Pre-service Teachers' Assessment Literacy
Yuang Wei, Fei Wang, Yifan Zhang, Brian Y. Lim, Bo Jiang
Abstract
Assessment literacy (AL) is essential for personalized education, yet difficult to cultivate in pre-service teachers. Conventional teacher preparation programs focus on theoretical knowledge, while digital assessment tools commonly provide opaque scores or parameters. These limitations hinder reflection and transfer, leaving AL underdeveloped. We propose XIA, an eXplainable Intelligent Assessment platform that extends statistics-informed support with visualized cognitive diagnostic reasoning, including contrastive and counterfactual explanations. In a pre-post controlled study with 21 pre-service teachers, we combined quantitative tasks and questionnaires with qualitative interviews. The findings offer preliminary evidence that XIA supported reflection, self-regulation, and assessment awareness, and helped reduce assessment errors. Interviews further showed a shift from score-based judgments toward evidence-based reasoning. This work contributes insights into the design of intelligent assessment tools, showing how explanatory scaffolding can bridge assessment theory and classroom practice and support the cultivation of AL in teacher education.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cd066fe7-28b2-4b3f-a4b0-2d22a843f3f6Builds on8
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Time2Stop: Adaptive and Explainable Human-AI Loop for Smartphone Overuse InterventionAdiba Orzikulova, Han Xiao, Zhipeng Li, Yukang Yan et al.CHI 2024 · 53 citations
- Contrastive Explanations That Anticipate Human Misconceptions Can Improve Human Decision-Making SkillsZana Buçinca, Siddharth Swaroop, Amanda E. Paluch, Finale Doshi-Velez et al.CHI 2025 · 31 citations
- Explaining It Your Way - Findings from a Co-Creative Design Workshop on Designing XAI Applications with AI End-Users from the Public SectorKatharina Weitz, Ruben Schlagowski, Elisabeth André, Maris Männiste et al.CHI 2024 · 28 citations
- Automated Essay Scoring: A Reflection on the State of the ArtShengjie Li, Vincent NgEMNLP 2024 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Explainable Active Learning (XAL): Toward AI Explanations as Interfaces for Machine TeachersBhavya Ghai, Q. Vera Liao, Yunfeng Zhang, Rachel K. E. Bellamy et al.CSCW 2020 · 107 citations
- Understanding the impact of explanations on advice-taking: a user study for AI-based clinical Decision Support SystemsCecilia Panigutti, Andrea Beretta, Fosca Giannotti, Dino PedreschiCHI 2022 · 129 citations
- Interpretable Directed Diversity: Leveraging Model Explanations for Iterative Crowd IdeationYunlong Wang, Priyadarshini Venkatesh, Brian Y. LimCHI 2022 · 20 citations
- Intelligent Support Engages Writers Through Relevant Cognitive ProcessesAndreas Göldi, Thiemo Wambsganss, Seyed Parsa Neshaei, Roman RietscheCHI 2024 · 20 citations
- iRULER: Intelligible Rubric-Based User-Defined LLM Evaluation for RevisionJingwen Bai, Wei Soon Cheong, Philippe Muller, Brian Y. LimCHI 2026 · 1 citation
