Easy Guided Decoding in Providing Suggestions for Interactive Machine Translation
Ke Wang, Xin Ge, Jiayi Wang, Yuqi Zhang, Yu Zhao
Abstract
Machine translation technology has made great progress in recent years, but it cannot guarantee error-free results. Human translators perform post-editing on machine translations to correct errors in the scene of computer-aided translation. In favor of expediting the post-editing process, many works have investigated machine translation in interactive modes, in which machines can automatically refine the rest of translations constrained by human's edits. Translation Suggestion (TS), as an interactive mode to assist human translators, requires machines to generate alternatives for specific incorrect words or phrases selected by human translators. In this paper, we utilize the parameterized objective function of neural machine translation (NMT) and propose a novel constrained decoding algorithm, namely Prefix-Suffix Guided Decoding (PSGD), to deal with the TS problem without additional training. Compared to the state-of-the-art lexically constrained decoding method, PSGD improves translation quality by an average of 10.87 BLEU and 8.62 BLEU on the WeTS 1 and the WMT 2022 Translation Suggestion datasets 2 , respectively, and reduces decoding time overhead by an average of 63.4% tested on the WMT translation datasets. Furthermore, on both of the TS benchmark datasets, it is superior to other supervised learning systems trained with TS annotated data. * indicates equal contribution. † indicates the corresponding author.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cceee261-bd3f-4571-a7b1-74fd1f52f0b3Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at ScaleAlexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary et al.ACL 2020 · 539 citations
- Universal Sentence Representation Learning with Conditional Masked Language ModelZiyi Yang, Yinfei Yang, Daniel Cer, Jax Law et al.EMNLP 2021 · 37 citations
- MMPE: A Multi-Modal Interface for Post-Editing Machine TranslationNico Herbig, Tim Düwel, Santanu Pal, Kalliopi Meladaki et al.ACL 2020 · 24 citations
Related papers
- WeTS: A Benchmark for Translation SuggestionZhen Yang, Fandong Meng, Yingxue Zhang, Ernan Li et al.EMNLP 2022 · 5 citations
- Balancing Quality and Human Involvement: An Effective Approach to Interactive Neural Machine TranslationTianxiang Zhao, Lemao Liu, Guoping Huang, Huayang Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 21 citations
- Neural Machine Translation Quality and Post-Editing PerformanceVilém Zouhar, Martin Popel, Ondrej Bojar, Ales TamchynaEMNLP 2021 · 13 citations
- Accurate Online Posterior Alignments for Principled Lexically-Constrained DecodingSoumya Chatterjee, Sunita Sarawagi, Preethi JyothiACL 2022
- IMTLab: An Open-Source Platform for Building, Evaluating, and Diagnosing Interactive Machine Translation SystemsXu Huang, Zhirui Zhang, Ruize Gao, Yichao Du et al.EMNLP 2023
