Better than Your Teacher: LLM Agents that learn from Privileged AI Feedback
Sanjiban Choudhury, Paloma Sodhi
Abstract
While large language models (LLMs) show impressive decision-making abilities, current methods lack a mechanism for automatic self-improvement from errors during task execution. We propose LEAP, an iterative fine-tuning framework that continually improves LLM agents using feedback from AI expert teachers. Our key insight is to equip the expert teachers with a privileged state -- information that is available during training but hidden at test time. This allows even weak experts to provide precise guidance, significantly improving the student agent's performance without access to privileged information at test time. We evaluate LEAP on diverse decision-making benchmarks, including text-based games (ALFWorld), web navigation (WebShop), and interactive coding (Intercode Bash). Our experiments show that LEAP (1) outperforms behavior cloning and ReAct baselines (2) enables weak student models (e.g., Llama3-8B) to exceed the performance of strong teacher models (GPT4-o), and (3) allows weak models to self-improve using privileged versions of themselves. We also provide a theoretical analysis showing that LEAP's success hinges on balancing privileged information with the student's realizability, which we empirically validate. Our code is available at https://leap-llm.github.io
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cce02ba7-079c-423f-89ff-d3176bb24673Cited by top-tier papers5
- All Roads Lead to Likelihood: The Value of Reinforcement Learning in Fine-TuningGokul Swamy, Sanjiban Choudhury, Wen Sun, Steven Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 66 citations
- Exploratory Memory-Augmented LLM Agent via Hybrid On- and Off-Policy OptimizationZeyuan Liu, Jeonghye Kim, Xufang Luo, Dongsheng Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Graph2Eval: Automatic Multimodal Task Generation for Agents via Knowledge GraphsYurun Chen, Xueyu Hu, Yuhan Liu, Ziqi Wang et al.CVPR 2026 · 7 citations
- Preemptive Detection and Correction of Misaligned Actions in LLM AgentsHaishuo Fang, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna GurevychEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Multi-Turn Code Generation Through Single-Step RewardsArnav Kumar Jain, Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Wayne Chen, Alexander M. Rush et al.ICML 2025
Builds on24
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
Related papers
- Policy Improvement using Language Feedback ModelsVictor Zhong, Dipendra Misra, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre CôtéNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- The Lighthouse of Language: Enhancing LLM Agents via Critique-Guided ImprovementRuihan Yang, Fanghua Ye, Jian Li, Siyu Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- A Critical Evaluation of AI Feedback for Aligning Large Language ModelsArchit Sharma, Sedrick Scott Keh, Eric Mitchell, Chelsea Finn et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 50 citations
- AgentRefine: Enhancing Agent Generalization through Refinement TuningDayuan Fu, Keqing He, Yejie Wang, Wentao Hong et al.ICLR 2025
