Q-Distribution guided Q-learning for offline reinforcement learning: Uncertainty penalized Q-value via consistency model
Jing Zhang, Linjiajie Fang, Kexin Shi, Wenjia Wang, Bingyi Jing
Abstract
``Distribution shift'' is the main obstacle to the success of offline reinforcement learning. A learning policy may take actions beyond the behavior policy's knowledge, referred to as Out-of-Distribution (OOD) actions. The Q-values for these OOD actions can be easily overestimated. As a result, the learning policy is biased by using incorrect Q-value estimates. One common approach to avoid Q-value overestimation is to make a pessimistic adjustment. Our key idea is to penalize the Q-values of OOD actions associated with high uncertainty. In this work, we propose Q-Distribution Guided Q-Learning (QDQ), which applies a pessimistic adjustment to Q-values in OOD regions based on uncertainty estimation. This uncertainty measure relies on the conditional Q-value distribution, learned through a high-fidelity and efficient consistency model. Additionally, to prevent overly conservative estimates, we introduce an uncertainty-aware optimization objective for updating the Q-value function. The proposed QDQ demonstrates solid theoretical guarantees for the accuracy of Q-value distribution learning and uncertainty measurement, as well as the performance of the learning policy. QDQ consistently shows strong performance on the D4RL benchmark and achieves significant improvements across many tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ccdc0ee4-3a94-45d5-b363-00722a6925eaCited by top-tier papers3
- Long-Horizon Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning Without Explicit ConservatismTianwei Ni, Esther Derman, Vineet Jain, Vincent Taboga et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- ADM-v2: Pursuing Full-Horizon Roll-out in Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Learning and EvaluationHaoxin Lin, Siyuan Xiao, Yi-Chen Li, Zhilong Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
- Peng's Q(π) for Conservative Value Estimation in Offline Reinforcement LearningByeongchan Kim, Min-hwan OhICLR 2026
Builds on32
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative ModelsTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, Samuli LaineNeurIPS 2022 · 3,959 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Improved Techniques for Training Score-Based Generative ModelsYang Song, Stefano ErmonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,527 citations
Related papers
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Dynamic Uncertainty Estimation for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiesheng Wang, Lin Li, Wei Wei, Yujia Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Exclusively Penalized Q-learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJunghyuk Yeom, Yonghyeon Jo, Jeongmo Kim, Sanghyeon Lee et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
- Offline RL with Smooth OOD Generalization in Convex Hull and its NeighborhoodQingmao Yao, Zhichao Lei, Tianyuan Chen, Ziyue Yuan et al.ICLR 2025
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
