Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling
Lei Li, Yekun Chai, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun, Hao Tian, Ningyu Zhang, Hua Wu
Abstract
Reward modeling (a.k.a., preference modeling) is instrumental for aligning large language models with human preferences, particularly within the context of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). While conventional reward models (RMs) have exhibited remarkable scalability, they oft struggle with fundamental functionality such as arithmetic computation, code execution, and factual lookup. In this paper, we propose a tool-augmented preference modeling approach, named Themis, to address these limitations by empowering RMs with access to external environments, including calculators and search engines. This approach not only fosters synergy between tool utilization and reward grading but also enhances interpretive capacity and scoring reliability. Our study delves into the integration of external tools into RMs, enabling them to interact with diverse external sources and construct task-specific tool engagement and reasoning traces in an autoregressive manner. We validate our approach across a wide range of domains, incorporating seven distinct external tools. Our experimental results demonstrate a noteworthy overall improvement of 17.7% across eight tasks in preference ranking. Furthermore, our approach outperforms Gopher 280B by 7.3% on TruthfulQA task in zero-shot evaluation. In human evaluations, RLHF trained with Themis attains an average win rate of 32% when compared to baselines across four distinct tasks. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive collection of tool-related RM datasets, incorporating data from seven distinct tool APIs, totaling 15,000 instances. We have made the code, data, and model checkpoints publicly available to facilitate and inspire further research advancements.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 12 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward ModelsAlexandre Ramé, Nino Vieillard, Léonard Hussenot, Robert Dadashi et al.ICML 2024 · 145 citations
- Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackHaoran Sun, Yekun Chai, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun et al.ACL 2025 · 17 citations
- Incentivizing Agentic Reasoning in LLM Judges via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement LearningRan Xu, Jingjing Chen, Jiayu Ye, Yu Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- T1: Tool-integrated Verification for Test-time Compute Scaling in Small Language ModelsMinki Kang, Jongwon Jeong, Jaewoong ChoICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Truthful or Fabricated? Using Causal Attribution to Mitigate Reward Hacking in ExplanationsPedro Lobato Ferreira, Wilker Aziz, Ivan TitovICLR 2026 · 12 citations
Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
Related papers
- Empowering LLM Tool Invocation with Tool-call Reward ModelDa Ma, Ziyue Yang, Hongshen Xu, Haotian Fang et al.ICLR 2026
- ToolRM: Towards Agentic Tool-Use Reward ModelingRenhao Li, Jianhong Tu, Yang Su, Yantao Liu et al.ACL Findings 2026
- ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment FrameworkKai Qin, Liangxin Liu, Yu Liang, Longzheng Wang et al.ACL 2026
- Aligning Agents via Planning: A Benchmark for Trajectory-Level Reward ModelingJiaxuan Wang, Yulan Hu, Wenjin Yang, Zheng Pan et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning NeedsCheng Qian, Emre Can Acikgoz, Qi He, Hongru Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 387 citations
