Revisiting Orbital Minimization Method for Neural Operator Decomposition
Jongha Ryu, Samuel Zhou, Gregory W. Wornell
Abstract
Spectral decomposition of linear operators plays a central role in many areas of machine learning and scientific computing. Recent work has explored training neural networks to approximate eigenfunctions of such operators, enabling scalable approaches to representation learning, dynamical systems, and partial differential equations (PDEs). In this paper, we revisit a classical optimization framework from the computational physics literature known as the orbital minimization method (OMM), originally proposed in the 1990s for solving eigenvalue problems in computational chemistry. We provide a simple linear-algebraic proof of the consistency of the OMM objective, and reveal connections between this method and several ideas that have appeared independently across different domains. Our primary goal is to justify its broader applicability in modern learning pipelines. We adapt this framework to train neural networks to decompose positive semidefinite operators, and demonstrate its practical advantages across a range of benchmark tasks. Our results highlight how revisiting classical numerical methods through the lens of modern theory and computation can provide not only a principled approach for deploying neural networks in numerical simulation, but also effective and scalable tools for machine learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc82014e-290c-4b7b-9ec6-46a945b7c7abCited by top-tier papers2
- Efficient Parametric SVD of Koopman Operator for Stochastic Dynamical SystemsMinchan Jeong, Jongha Ryu, Se-Young Yun, Gregory W. WornellNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Learning Interpretable Options by Identifying Reward Diffusion Bottlenecks in Reinforcement LearningYiming Fei, Ziming Wang, Rui Yan, Huajin TangICML 2026
Builds on15
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional DomainsMatthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,036 citations
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised LearningLi Jing, Pascal Vincent, Yann LeCun, Yuandong TianICLR 2022 · 467 citations
- Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive LossJeff Z. HaoChen, Colin Wei, Adrien Gaidon, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
Related papers
- Operator SVD with Neural Networks via Nested Low-Rank ApproximationJongha Jon Ryu, Xiangxiang Xu, Hasan Sabri Melihcan Erol, Yuheng Bu et al.ICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Neural Spectral Methods: Self-supervised learning in the spectral domainYiheng Du, Nithin Chalapathi, Aditi S. KrishnapriyanICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Interpolating Neural Network-Tensor Decomposition (INN-TD): a scalable and interpretable approach for large-scale physics-based problemsJiachen Guo, Xiaoyu Xie, Chanwook Park, Hantao Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- Learning Data-Efficient and Generalizable Neural Operators via Fundamental Physics KnowledgeSiying (Sydney) Ma, Mehrdad Momeni Zadeh, Mauricio Soroco, Wuyang Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Generalizing Neural Wave FunctionsNicholas Gao, Stephan GünnemannICML 2023 · 38 citations
