Robust Computation of Boundary Path Integrals Using Kernel-Density Estimation
Peiyu Xu, Lifan Wu, Benedikt Bitterli, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Shuang Zhao
Abstract
To enable differentiation with respect to object geometries, boundary path integrals—central to physics-based differentiable rendering—must be estimated numerically. Although their mathematical formulation is well established, designing efficient and robust numerical estimators remains challenging. Most state-of-the-art boundary sampling methods rely on primary-sample-space guiding, which tends to break down on finely tessellated geometries; reparameterization-based alternatives, meanwhile, often incur high variance and/or significant computational overhead. In this paper, we introduce a simple, robust, and consistent solution to this problem. At the core of our approach is a novel formulation of the boundary integral based on kernel-density estimation. Much like photon mapping, we slightly expand the measure-zero domain of integration with a kernel, sidestepping the need to sample directly on a delta-function region in path space. To our knowledge, this is the first such application of kernel-density methods for boundary integral evaluation. We validate our method by comparing its derivative estimates against finite differences (FD), and further demonstrate its practical utility by benchmarking against several state-of-the-art baselines in synthetic inverse-rendering scenarios.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc550199-d771-41f6-85cb-020ea0a0d253Builds on8
- Path-space differentiable renderingCheng Zhang, Bailey Miller, Kai Yan, Ioannis Gkioulekas et al.SIGGRAPH 2020 · 155 citations
- Monte Carlo estimators for differential light transportTizian Zeltner, Sébastien Speierer, Iliyan Georgiev, Wenzel JakobSIGGRAPH 2021 · 70 citations
- Antithetic sampling for Monte Carlo differentiable renderingCheng Zhang, Zhao Dong, Michael C. Doggett, Shuang ZhaoSIGGRAPH 2021 · 55 citations
- Efficient estimation of boundary integrals for path-space differentiable renderingKai Yan, Christoph Lassner, Brian Budge, Zhao Dong et al.SIGGRAPH 2022 · 34 citations
- Parameter-space ReSTIR for Differentiable and Inverse RenderingWesley Chang, Venkataram Sivaram, Derek Nowrouzezahrai, Toshiya Hachisuka et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Path-Space Differentiable Rendering of Implicit SurfacesSiwei Zhou, Youngha Chang, Nobuhiko Mukai, Hiroaki Santo et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 1 citation
- Quadric-Based Silhouette Sampling for Differentiable RenderingMariia Soroka, Christoph Peters, Steve MarschnerSIGGRAPH 2025 · 2 citations
- Conditional Mixture Path Guiding for Differentiable RenderingZhimin Fan, Pengcheng Shi, Mufan Guo, Ruoyu Fu et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 7 citations
- Path-space differentiable rendering of participating mediaCheng Zhang, Zihan Yu, Shuang ZhaoSIGGRAPH 2021 · 50 citations
- Recursive Control Variates for Inverse RenderingBaptiste Nicolet, Fabrice Rousselle, Jan Novák, Alexander Keller et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 32 citations
