Direct Preference Optimization for Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical RL: A Bilevel Approach
Utsav Singh, Souradip Chakraborty, Wesley Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Derrik Asher, Anit Kumar Sahu, Mubarak Shah, Vinay P. Namboodiri, Amrit Singh Bedi
Abstract
Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) enables agents to solve complex, longhorizon tasks by decomposing them into manageable sub-tasks. However, HRL methods face two fundamental challenges: (i) non-stationarity caused by the evolving lower-level policy during training, which destabilizes higher-level learning, and (ii) the generation of infeasible subgoals that lower-level policies cannot achieve. To address these challenges, we introduce DIPPER, a novel HRL framework that formulates goal-conditioned HRL as a bi-level optimization problem and leverages direct preference optimization (DPO) to train the higher-level policy. By learning from stationary preference comparisons over subgoal sequences rather than rewards that depend on the evolving lower-level policy, DIPPER mitigates the impact of non-stationarity on hierarchical learning. To address infeasible subgoals, DIPPER incorporates lower-level value function regularization that encourages the higherlevel policy to propose achievable subgoals. We also introduce two novel metrics to quantitatively verify that DIPPER mitigates non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation issues in HRL. We perform empirical evaluations on challenging robotic navigation and manipulation benchmarks and show that DIPPER achieves upto 40% improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating that preference-based methods can effectively alleviate persistent challenges in hierarchical learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc50e95c-9989-445e-9b8b-45a1d258833bBuilds on9
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingKimin Lee, Laura M. Smith, Pieter AbbeelICML 2021 · 380 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Imagined SubgoalsElliot Chane-Sane, Cordelia Schmid, Ivan LaptevICML 2021 · 183 citations
- BOME! Bilevel Optimization Made Easy: A Simple First-Order ApproachBo Liu, Mao Ye, Stephen Wright, Peter Stone et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 170 citations
Related papers
- PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight RelabelingUtsav Singh, Wesley A. Suttle, Brian M. Sadler, Vinay P. Namboodiri et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- State-Conditioned Adversarial Subgoal GenerationVivienne Huiling Wang, Joni Pajarinen, Tinghuai Wang, Joni-Kristian KämäräinenAAAI 2023 · 16 citations
- CRISP: Curriculum-Inducing Primitive Informed Subgoal Prediction for Boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningUtsav Singh, Vinay P. NamboodiriAAAI 2026 · 6 citations
- PEAR: Primitive Enabled Adaptive Relabeling for Boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningUtsav Singh, Vinay P. NamboodiriICLR 2025
- Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Timed SubgoalsNico Gürtler, Dieter Büchler, Georg MartiusNeurIPS 2021 · 43 citations
