CASPER in the Machine: Insights into Character Variety in LLM-Generated Stories
Anneliese Brei, Abhisheik Sharma, Nicholas Sanaie, Lu Wang, Snigdha Chaturvedi
Abstract
As LLM-generated text is increasingly used, especially in fictional domains, we explore how much LLM-generated stories differ from human-written stories. In this work, we focus on characters. We borrow definitions from narratology to analyze 8 intricate category-pairs of character, such as stylization and wholeness. These category-pairs consider more than just basic characteristics. They assess how characters are portrayed within their stories. After automatically inferring categories of characters within both LLM and human-written stories, we compare and contrast these two sets of stories. We consider the following overarching questions: (1) Do LLMs and human-written stories have similar characters? and (2) Do LLMs generate stories with a variety of characters? Our analysis includes research questions that focus on stories generated by popular LLMs and recently published human-written stories. We describe a number of interesting similarities, differences and key takeaways. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc189a82-3f69-4aba-8ae6-0697e586a925Builds on10
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextAbhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi et al.ICML 2024 · 262 citations
- Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry ProfessionalsPiotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, Richard EvansCHI 2023 · 235 citations
- Narrative Theory for Computational Narrative UnderstandingAndrew Piper, Richard Jean So, David BammanEMNLP 2021 · 62 citations
- People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated textJenna Russell, Marzena Karpinska, Mohit IyyerACL 2025 · 39 citations
Related papers
- Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language ModelsSergio E. Zanotto, Segun AroyehunEMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- StoryAnalogy: Deriving Story-level Analogies from Large Language Models to Unlock Analogical UnderstandingCheng Jiayang, Lin Qiu, Tsz Ho Chan, Tianqing Fang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 8 citations
- Is Human-Like Text Liked by Humans? Multilingual Human Detection and Preference Against AIYuxia Wang, Rui Xing, Jonibek Mansurov, Giovanni Puccetti et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- An Empirical Analysis of the Writing Styles of Persona-Assigned LLMsManuj Malik, Jing Jiang, Kian Ming A. ChaiEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Beyond Checkmate: Exploring the Creative Choke Points for AI Generated TextsNafis Irtiza Tripto, Saranya Venkatraman, Mahjabin Nahar, Dongwon LeeEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
