Breaking the Trade-Off Between Faithfulness and Expressiveness for Large Language Models
Chenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Lanrui Wang, Zheng Lin
Abstract
Grounding responses in external knowledge represents an effective strategy for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, current LLMs struggle to seamlessly integrate knowledge while simultaneously maintaining faithfulness (or fidelity) and expressiveness, capabilities that humans naturally possess. This limitation results in outputs that either lack support from external knowledge, thereby compromising faithfulness, or appear overly verbose and unnatural, thus sacrificing expressiveness. In this work, to break the trade-off between faithfulness and expressiveness, we propose Collaborative Decoding (CoDe), a novel approach that dynamically integrates output probabilities generated with and without external knowledge. This integration is guided by distribution divergence and model confidence, enabling the selective activation of relevant and reliable expressions from the model's internal parameters. Furthermore, we introduce a knowledge-aware reranking mechanism that prevents over-reliance on prior parametric knowledge while ensuring proper utilization of provided external information. Through comprehensive experiments, our plug-and-play CoDe framework demonstrates superior performance in enhancing faithfulness without compromising expressiveness across diverse LLMs and evaluation metrics, validating both its effectiveness and generalizability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cb38d4e0-16fe-4fa8-bf19-0db648269f33Builds on32
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail KnowledgeNikhil Kandpal, Haikang Deng, Adam Roberts, Eric Wallace et al.ICML 2023 · 623 citations
Related papers
- CODE: Contrasting Self-generated Description to Combat Hallucination in Large Multi-modal ModelsJunho Kim, Hyunjun Kim, Yeonju Kim, Yong Man RoNeurIPS 2024 · 55 citations
- VCGD: Visual Clue Guided Decoding with Caption Model for Mitigating Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language ModelsGuoqing Chen, Fu Zhang, Bingqian Liu, Chenglong Lu et al.AAAI 2026
- Attributive Reasoning for Hallucination Diagnosis of Large Language ModelsYuyan Chen, Zehao Li, Shuangjie You, Zhengyu Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 33 citations
- Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Language Models through Multi-Model Contrastive Decoding and Dynamic Hallucination DetectionChenyu Zhu, Yefeng Liu, Hao Zhang, Aowen Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination MitigationChenxi Wang, Xiang Chen, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian et al.ICLR 2025
