Ranking-Based Semantics for Sets of Attacking Arguments
Bruno Yun, Srdjan Vesic, Madalina Croitoru
Abstract
Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Ranking-based semantics received a lot of attention recently. All of the semantics introduced so far are applicable to binary attack relations. In this paper, we study a more general case when sets of arguments can jointly attack an argument. We generalise existing postulates for ranking-based semantics to fit this framework, define a general variant of h-categoriser, prove that it converges for every argumentation framework and study the postulates it satisfies. We also study the link between binary and hypergraph version of h-categoriser.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Related papers
- A General Setting for Gradual Semantics Dealing with SimilarityLeila Amgoud, Victor DavidAAAI 2021 · 13 citations
- Redefining ABA+ Semantics via Abstract Set-to-Set AttacksYannis Dimopoulos, Wolfgang Dvorák, Matthias König, Anna Rapberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 7 citations
- Hybrid Semantics Accounting for Argument TypesLeila Amgoud, Marco Hanocq, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-SchiexAAAI 2026
- An Extension-Based Argument-Ranking Semantics: Social Rankings in Abstract ArgumentationLars Bengel, Giovanni Buraglio, Jan Maly, Kenneth SkibaAAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Convergent Semantics for Weighted Bipolar ArgumentationZongshun Wang, Yuping ShenAAAI 2026
