Learning Representations by Humans, for Humans
Sophie Hilgard, Nir Rosenfeld, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Jack Cao, David C. Parkes
Abstract
We propose a new, complementary approach to interpretability, in which machines are not considered as experts whose role it is to suggest what should be done and why, but rather as advisers. The objective of these models is to communicate to a human decision-maker not what to decide but how to decide. In this way, we propose that machine learning pipelines will be more readily adopted, since they allow a decision-maker to retain agency. Specifically, we develop a framework for learning representations by humans, for humans, in which we learn representations of inputs (‘advice’) that are effective for human decision-making. Representation generating models are trained with humans-in-the-loop, implicitly incorporating the human decision-making model. We show that optimizing for human decision-making rather than accuracy is effective in promoting good decisions in various classification tasks while inherently maintaining a sense of interpretability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cb030351-7670-486d-8e57-ad33797ef2e2Cited by top-tier papers5
- A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic ScoresMaria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, Alexandra ChouldechovaCHI 2020 · 176 citations
- Pragmatic Image Compression for Human-in-the-Loop Decision-MakingSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 16 citations
- Decongestion by Representation: Learning to Improve Economic Welfare in MarketplacesOmer Nahum, Gali Noti, David C. Parkes, Nir RosenfeldICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- What's Producible May Not Be Reachable: Measuring the Steerability of Generative ModelsKeyon Vafa, Sarah Bentley, Jon M. Kleinberg, Sendhil MullainathanNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- AIDED: Augmenting Interior Design with Human Experience Data for Designer-AI Co-DesignYang Chen Lin, Chen-Ying Chien, Kai-Hsin Hou, Hung-Yu Chen et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on4
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an ExpertHussein Mozannar, David A. SontagICML 2020 · 267 citations
- A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic ScoresMaria De-Arteaga, Riccardo Fogliato, Alexandra ChouldechovaCHI 2020 · 176 citations
Related papers
- Are We Closing the Loop Yet? Gaps in the Generalizability of VIS4ML ResearchHariharan Subramonyam, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2023 · 10 citations
- Widening the Pipeline in Human-Guided Reinforcement Learning with Explanation and Context-Aware Data AugmentationLin Guan, Mudit Verma, Sihang Guo, Ruohan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 57 citations
- Preventing Harmful Data Practices by using Participatory Input to Navigate the Machine Learning MultiverseJan Simson, Fiona Draxler, Samuel Mehr, Christoph KernCHI 2025 · 3 citations
- RA3: A Human-in-the-loop Framework for Interpreting and Improving Image Captioning with Relation-Aware Attribution AnalysisLei Chai, Lu Qi, Hailong Sun, Jingzheng LiICDE 2024
- Zero-Shot Assistance in Sequential Decision ProblemsSebastiaan De Peuter, Samuel KaskiAAAI 2023 · 6 citations
