Game Solving with Online Fine-Tuning
Ti-Rong Wu, Hung Guei, Ting-Han Wei, Chung-Chin Shih, Jui-Te Chin, I-Chen Wu
Abstract
Game solving is a similar, yet more difficult task than mastering a game. Solving a game typically means to find the game-theoretic value (outcome given optimal play), and optionally a full strategy to follow in order to achieve that outcome. The AlphaZero algorithm has demonstrated super-human level play, and its powerful policy and value predictions have also served as heuristics in game solving. However, to solve a game and obtain a full strategy, a winning response must be found for all possible moves by the losing player. This includes very poor lines of play from the losing side, for which the AlphaZero self-play process will not encounter. AlphaZero-based heuristics can be highly inaccurate when evaluating these out-of-distribution positions, which occur throughout the entire search. To address this issue, this paper investigates applying online fine-tuning while searching and proposes two methods to learn tailor-designed heuristics for game solving. Our experiments show that using online fine-tuning can solve a series of challenging 7x7 Killall-Go problems, using only 23.54% of computation time compared to the baseline without online fine-tuning. Results suggest that the savings scale with problem size. Our method can further be extended to any tree search algorithm for problem solving. Our code is available at https://rlg.iis.sinica.edu.tw/papers/neurips2023-online-fine-tuning-solver.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cae3f1ab-c329-403f-93f9-8b06af14b583Builds on6
- Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement LearningAdam Gleave, Michael Dennis, Cody Wild, Neel Kant et al.ICLR 2020 · 415 citations
- HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem ProvingGuillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 271 citations
- Policy improvement by planning with GumbelIvo Danihelka, Arthur Guez, Julian Schrittwieser, David SilverICLR 2022 · 84 citations
- Are AlphaZero-like Agents Robust to Adversarial Perturbations?Li-Cheng Lan, Huan Zhang, Ti-Rong Wu, Meng-Yu Tsai et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 15 citations
- AlphaZero-based Proof Cost Network to Aid Game SolvingTi-Rong Wu, Chung-Chin Shih, Ting-Han Wei, Meng-Yu Tsai et al.ICLR 2022 · 9 citations
Related papers
- A Novel Approach to Solving Goal-Achieving Problems for Board GamesChung-Chin Shih, Ti-Rong Wu, Ting-Han Wei, I-Chen WuAAAI 2022 · 7 citations
- Efficient Learning for AlphaZero via Path ConsistencyDengwei Zhao, Shikui Tu, Lei XuICML 2022 · 8 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for General Game PlayingAdrian Goldwaser, Michael ThielscherAAAI 2020 · 46 citations
- Regret-Guided Search Control for Efficient Learning in AlphaZeroYun-Jui Tsai, Wei-Yu Chen, Yan-Ru Ju, Yu-Hung Chang et al.ICLR 2026
- Monte-Carlo Tree Search as Regularized Policy OptimizationJean-Bastien Grill, Florent Altché, Yunhao Tang, Thomas Hubert et al.ICML 2020 · 84 citations
