Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models
Ashwinee Panda, Xinyu Tang, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Prateek Mittal
Abstract
Current techniques for privacy auditing of large language models (LLMs) have limited efficacy-they rely on basic approaches to generate canaries which leads to weak membership inference attacks that in turn give loose lower bounds on the empirical privacy leakage. We develop canaries that are far more effective than those used in prior work under threat models that cover a range of realistic settings. We demonstrate through extensive experiments on multiple families of fine-tuned LLMs that our approach sets a new standard for detection of privacy leakage. For measuring the memorization rate of non-privately trained LLMs, our designed canaries surpass prior approaches. For example, on the Qwen2.5-0.5B model, our designed canaries achieve 49.6% TPR at 1% FPR, vastly surpassing the prior approach's 4.2% TPR at 1% FPR. Our method can be used to provide a privacy audit of ε ≈ 1 for a model trained with theoretical ε of 4. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a privacy audit of LLM training has achieved nontrivial auditing success in the setting where the attacker cannot train shadow models, insert gradient canaries, or access the model at every iteration.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cac5e407-137b-4ebe-9c38-0a9982949ccaCited by top-tier papers12
- Exploring the limits of strong membership inference attacks on large language modelsJamie Hayes, Ilia Shumailov, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 26 citations
- Hubble: a Model Suite to Advance the Study of LLM MemorizationJohnny Wei, Ameya Godbole, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Ryan Yixiang Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 22 citations
- Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language ModelsBartlomiej Marek, Lorenzo Rossi, Vincent Hanke, Xun Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient DescentMatteo Boglioni, Terrance Liu, Andrew Ilyas, Steven WuICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Train Once, Answer All: Many Pretraining Experiments for the Cost of OneSebastian Bordt, Martin PawelczykICLR 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on38
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
Related papers
- The Canary's Echo: Auditing Privacy Risks of LLM-Generated Synthetic TextMatthieu Meeus, Lukas Wutschitz, Santiago Zanella-Béguelin, Shruti Tople et al.ICML 2025
- OptiFluence: Principled Design of Privacy CanariesMohammad Yaghini, Michael Aerni, Junrui Zhang, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICML 2026
- Information-Theoretic Membership Inference for Granular Quantification of MemorizationJiashu Tao, Reza ShokriICLR 2026
- Powerful Training-Free Membership Inference Against Fine-Tuned Autoregressive Language ModelsDavid Ilic, David Stanojevic, Kostadin CvejoskiACL 2026
- Natural Identifiers for Privacy and Data Audits in Large Language ModelsLorenzo Rossi, Bartlomiej Marek, Franziska Boenisch, Adam DziedzicICLR 2026 · 3 citations
