Rethinking the Benefits of Steerable Features in 3D Equivariant Graph Neural Networks
Shih-Hsin Wang, Yung-Chang Hsu, Justin M. Baker, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Jack Xin, Bao Wang
Abstract
Theoretical and empirical comparisons have been made to assess the expressive power and performance of invariant and equivariant GNNs. However, there is currently no theoretical result comparing the expressive power of k-hop invariant GNNs and equivariant GNNs. Additionally, little is understood about whether the performance of equivariant GNNs, employing steerable features up to type-L, increases as L grows -especially when the feature dimension is held constant. In this study, we introduce a key lemma that allows us to analyze steerable features by examining their corresponding invariant features. The lemma facilitates us in understanding the limitations of k-hop invariant GNNs, which fail to capture the global geometric structure due to the loss of geometric information between local structures. Furthermore, we analyze the ability of steerable features to carry information by studying their corresponding invariant features. In particular, we establish that when the input spatial embedding has full rank, the informationcarrying ability of steerable features is characterized by their dimension and remains independent of the feature types. This suggests that when the feature dimension is constant, increasing L does not lead to essentially improved performance in equivariant GNNs employing steerable features up to type-L. We substantiate our theoretical insights with numerical evidence.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- An Explicit Frame Construction for Normalizing 3D Point CloudsJustin M. Baker, Shih-Hsin Wang, Tommaso de Fernex, Bao WangICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Universally Invariant Learning in Equivariant GNNsJiacheng Cen, Anyi Li, Ning Lin, Tingyang Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Interpreting Equivariant RepresentationsAndreas Abildtrup Hansen, Anna Calissano, Aasa FeragenICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Quasi-Equivariant MetanetworksViet-Hoang Tran, An Nguyen The, Benoît Guérand, Thieu Vo et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- A Theoretically-Principled Sparse, Connected, and Rigid Graph Representation of MoleculesShih-Hsin Wang, Yuhao Huang, Justin M. Baker, Yuan-En Sun et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on26
- MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force FieldsIlyes Batatia, Dávid Péter Kovács, Gregor N. C. Simm, Christoph Ortner et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,448 citations
- E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksVictor Garcia Satorras, Emiel Hoogeboom, Max WellingICML 2021 · 1,432 citations
- Directional Message Passing for Molecular GraphsJohannes Klicpera, Janek Groß, Stephan GünnemannICLR 2020 · 1,079 citations
- SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention NetworksFabian Fuchs, Daniel E. Worrall, Volker Fischer, Max WellingNeurIPS 2020 · 1,025 citations
- Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectraKristof Schütt, Oliver T. Unke, Michael GasteggerICML 2021 · 736 citations
Related papers
- A Characterization Theorem for Equivariant Networks with Point-wise ActivationsMarco Pacini, Xiaowen Dong, Bruno Lepri, Gabriele SantinICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- A Wigner-Eckart Theorem for Group Equivariant Convolution KernelsLeon Lang, Maurice WeilerICLR 2021 · 60 citations
- Are High-Degree Representations Really Unnecessary in Equivariant Graph Neural Networks?Jiacheng Cen, Anyi Li, Ning Lin, Yuxiang Ren et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- Geometric and Physical Quantities improve E(3) Equivariant Message PassingJohannes Brandstetter, Rob Hesselink, Elise van der Pol, Erik J. Bekkers et al.ICLR 2022 · 307 citations
- Homomorphism Expressivity of Spectral Invariant Graph Neural NetworksJingchu Gai, Yiheng Du, Bohang Zhang, Haggai Maron et al.ICLR 2025
