Learning Optimal Predictive Checklists
Haoran Zhang, Quaid Morris, Berk Ustun, Marzyeh Ghassemi
Abstract
Checklists are simple decision aids that are often used to promote safety and reliability in clinical applications. In this paper, we present a method to learn checklists for clinical decision support. We represent predictive checklists as discrete linear classifiers with binary features and unit weights. We then learn globally optimal predictive checklists from data by solving an integer programming problem. Our method allows users to customize checklists to obey complex constraints, including constraints to enforce group fairness and to binarize realvalued features at training time. In addition, it pairs models with an optimality gap that can inform model development and determine the feasibility of learning sufficiently accurate checklists on a given dataset. We pair our method with specialized techniques that speed up its ability to train a predictive checklist that performs well and has a small optimality gap. We benchmark the performance of our method on seven clinical classification problems, and demonstrate its practical benefits by training a short-form checklist for PTSD screening. Our results show that our method can fit simple predictive checklists that perform well and that can easily be customized to obey a rich class of custom constraints. * Equal supervision.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca533109-52b9-4524-8e96-fb2799e7b131Cited by top-tier papers4
- Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior ConsistencyOwen Queen, Tom Hartvigsen, Teddy Koker, Huan He et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 55 citations
- When Personalization Harms Performance: Reconsidering the Use of Group Attributes in PredictionVinith Menon Suriyakumar, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Berk UstunICML 2023 · 10 citations
- Automatic Construction of Clinical Scoring Systems with LLM AgentsSilas Ruhrberg Estevez, Chris Chiu, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2026 · 1 citation
- On Fair Epsilon Net and Geometric Hitting SetMohsen Dehghankar, Stavros Sintos, Abolfazl AsudehVLDB 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- Manipulating and Measuring Model InterpretabilityForough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan et al.CHI 2021 · 663 citations
- Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and NeedsSungsoo Ray Hong, Jessica Hullman, Enrico BertiniCSCW 2020 · 219 citations
- Too Relaxed to Be FairMichael Lohaus, Michaël Perrot, Ulrike von LuxburgICML 2020 · 80 citations
Related papers
- Enforcing Constraints for Machine Learning Systems via Declarative Feature Selection: An Experimental StudyFelix Neutatz, Felix Biessmann, Ziawasch AbedjanSIGMOD 2021 · 7 citations
- Fair and Optimal Decision Trees: A Dynamic Programming ApproachJacobus G. M. van der Linden, Mathijs de Weerdt, Emir DemirovicNeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Fair Decisions from Calibrated Scores: Achieving Optimal Classification While Satisfying SufficiencyEtam Benger, Katrina LigettICML 2026
- Fair and Accurate Decision Making through Group-Aware LearningRamtin Hosseini, Li Zhang, Bhanu Garg, Pengtao XieICML 2023 · 6 citations
- Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective PerspectiveNatalia Martínez, Martín Bertrán, Guillermo SapiroICML 2020 · 232 citations
