Synapse: Trajectory-as-Exemplar Prompting with Memory for Computer Control
Longtao Zheng, Rundong Wang, Xinrun Wang, Bo An
Abstract
Building agents with large language models (LLMs) for computer control is a burgeoning research area, where the agent receives computer states and performs actions to complete complex tasks. Previous computer agents have demonstrated the benefits of in-context learning (ICL); however, their performance is hindered by several issues. First, the limited context length of LLMs and complex computer states restrict the number of exemplars, as a single webpage can consume the entire context. Second, the exemplars in current methods, such as high-level plans and multi-choice questions, cannot represent complete trajectories, leading to suboptimal performance in long-horizon tasks. Third, existing computer agents rely on task-specific exemplars and overlook the similarity among tasks, resulting in poor generalization to novel tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce SYNAPSE, a computer agent featuring three key components: i) state abstraction, which filters out task-irrelevant information from raw states, allowing more exemplars within the limited context, ii) trajectory-as-exemplar prompting, which prompts the LLM with complete trajectories of the abstracted states and actions to improve multi-step decision-making, and iii) exemplar memory, which stores the embeddings of exemplars and retrieves them via similarity search for generalization to novel tasks. We evaluate SYNAPSE on MiniWoB++, a standard task suite, and Mind2Web, a real-world website benchmark. In MiniWoB++, SYNAPSE achieves a 99.2% average success rate (a 10% relative improvement) across 64 tasks using demonstrations from only 48 tasks. Notably, SYNAPSE is the first ICL method to solve the book-flight task in MiniWoB++. SYNAPSE also exhibits a 56% relative improvement in average step success rate over the previous state-of-the-art prompting scheme in Mind2Web. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca345045-1c5e-4d1e-b353-89d9c52c0fdbCited by top-tier papers48
- ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning MemorySiru Ouyang, Jun Yan, I-Hung Hsu, Yanfei Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 244 citations
- G-Memory: Tracing Hierarchical Memory for Multi-Agent SystemsGuibin Zhang, Muxin Fu, Kun Wang, Frank Wan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 108 citations
- AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent SystemsYingxuan Yang, Huacan Chai, Shuai Shao, Yuanyi Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 104 citations
- MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory SystemsGuibin Zhang, Haotian Ren, Chong Zhan, Junhao Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 69 citations
- How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following BehaviorZidi Xiong, Yuping Lin, Wenya Xie, Pengfei He et al.ACL 2026 · 64 citations
Builds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- Language Models can Solve Computer TasksGeunwoo Kim, Pierre Baldi, Stephen McAleerNeurIPS 2023 · 539 citations
- WebSynthesis: World Model-Guided Monte Carlo Tree Search for Efficient WebAgent Trajectory SynthesisYifei Gao, Junhong Ye, Yifan Yang, Jiaqi Wang et al.ACL 2026
- Plan-and-Act: Improving Planning of Agents for Long-Horizon TasksLutfi Eren Erdogan, Nicholas Lee, Sehoon Kim, Suhong Moon et al.ICML 2025
- AgentSynth: Scalable Task Generation for Generalist Computer-Use AgentsJingxu Xie, Dylan Xu, Xuandong Zhao, Dawn SongICLR 2026 · 36 citations
- Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at ScaleRogerio Bonatti, Dan Zhao, Francesco Bonacci, Dillon Dupont et al.ICML 2025
