SES: Bridging the Gap Between Explainability and Prediction of Graph Neural Networks
Zhenhua Huang, Kunhao Li, Shaojie Wang, Zhaohong Jia, Wentao Zhu, Sharad Mehrotra
Abstract
Despite the Graph Neural Networks' (GNNs) pro-ficiency in analyzing graph data, achieving high-accuracy and interpretable predictions remains challenging. Existing GNN interpreters typically provide post-hoc explanations disjointed from GNNs' predictions, resulting in misrepresentations. Self-explainable GNNs offer built-in explanations during the training process. However, they cannot exploit the explanatory outcomes to augment prediction performance, and they fail to provide high-quality explanations of node features and require additional processes to generate explainable subgraphs, which is costly. To address the aforementioned limitations, we propose a self-explained and self-supervised graph neural network (SES) to bridge the gap between explainability and prediction. SES comprises two processes: explainable training and enhanced predictive learning. During explainable training, SES employs a global mask generator co-trained with a graph encoder and directly produces crucial structure and feature masks, reducing time consumption and providing node feature and subgraph explanations. In the enhanced predictive learning phase, mask-based positive-negative pairs are constructed utilizing the ex-planations to compute a triplet loss and enhance the node representations by contrastive learning. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of SES on multiple datasets and tasks. SES outperforms baselines on real-world node classification datasets by notable margins of up to 2.59% and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in explanation tasks on synthetic datasets with improvements of up to 3.0%. Moreover, SES delivers more coherent explanations on real-world datasets, has a fourfold increase in Fidelity+ score for explanation quality, and demonstrates faster training and expla-nation generating times. To our knowledge, SES is a pioneering GNN to achieve SOTA performance on both explanation and prediction tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca1c76c4-3de4-4b9b-b510-94a9d1c8a382Builds on12
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Spatial-Temporal Fusion Graph Neural Networks for Traffic Flow ForecastingMengzhang Li, Zhanxing ZhuAAAI 2021 · 1,037 citations
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-TrainingJiezhong Qiu, Qibin Chen, Yuxiao Dong, Jing Zhang et al.KDD 2020 · 755 citations
- PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural NetworksMinh N. Vu, My T. ThaiNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
Related papers
- SEHG: Bridging Interpretability and Prediction in Self-Explainable Heterogeneous Graph Neural NetworksZhenhua Huang, Wenhao Zhou, Yufeng Li, Xiuyang Wu et al.WWW 2025 · 6 citations
- Graph Segmentation and Contrastive Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksZhiqiang Wang, Jiayu Guo, Jianqing Liang, Jiye Liang et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Self-Interpretable Graph Learning with Sufficient and Necessary ExplanationsJiale Deng, Yanyan ShenAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Generative and Contrastive Paradigms Are Complementary for Graph Self-Supervised LearningYuxiang Wang, Xiao Yan, Chuang Hu, Quanqing Xu et al.ICDE 2024 · 11 citations
- Self-Interpretable Subgraph Neural Network with Deep Reinforcement Walk ExplorationJianming Huang, Hiroyuki KasaiAAAI 2026
