A perceptual model of motion quality for rendering with adaptive refresh-rate and resolution
Gyorgy Denes, Akshay Jindal, Aliaksei Mikhailiuk, Rafal K. Mantiuk
Abstract
Limited GPU performance budgets and transmission bandwidths mean that real-time rendering often has to compromise on the spatial resolution or temporal resolution (refresh rate). A common practice is to keep either the resolution or the refresh rate constant and dynamically control the other variable. But this strategy is non-optimal when the velocity of displayed content varies. To find the best trade-off between the spatial resolution and refresh rate, we propose a perceptual visual model that predicts the quality of motion given an object velocity and predictability of motion. The model considers two motion artifacts to establish an overall quality score: non-smooth (juddery) motion, and blur. Blur is modeled as a combined effect of eye motion, finite refresh rate and display resolution. To fit the free parameters of the proposed visual model, we measured eye movement for predictable and unpredictable motion, and conducted psychophysical experiments to measure the quality of motion from 50 Hz to 165 Hz. We demonstrate the utility of the model with our on-the-fly motion-adaptive rendering algorithm that adjusts the refresh rate of a G-Sync-capable monitor based on a given rendering budget and observed object motion. Our psychophysical validation experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm performs better than constant-refresh-rate solutions, showing that motion-adaptive rendering is an attractive technique for driving variable-refresh-rate displays.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca1af590-ff49-4ccd-96b2-66fc2b3abcefCited by top-tier papers8
- FovVideoVDP: a visible difference predictor for wide field-of-view videoRafal K. Mantiuk, Gyorgy Denes, Alexandre Chapiro, Anton Kaplanyan et al.SIGGRAPH 2021 · 158 citations
- ColorVideoVDP: A visual difference predictor for image, video and display distortionsRafal K. Mantiuk, Param Hanji, Maliha Ashraf, Yuta Asano et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 43 citations
- A perceptual model for eccentricity-dependent spatio-temporal flicker fusion and its applications to foveated graphicsBrooke Krajancich, Petr Kellnhofer, Gordon WetzsteinSIGGRAPH 2021 · 36 citations
- Locomotion-aware Foveated RenderingXuehuai Shi, Lili Wang, Jian Wu, Wei Ke et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 8 citations
- Saccade-Contingent RenderingYuna Kwak, Eric Penner, Xuan Wang, Mohammad R. Saeedpour-Parizi et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Streaming of rendered content with adaptive frame rate and resolutionYaru Liu, Joseph G. March, Rafal K. MantiukSIGGRAPH 2026
- Deep-Saliency Foveated Ray Tracing For Real-time VR RenderingYang Gao, Wencan Li, Shiyu Liang, Weizichuan Feng et al.IEEE VR 2026
- Effect of Frame Rate on User Experience, Performance, and Simulator Sickness in Virtual RealityJialin Wang, Rongkai Shi, Wenxuan Zheng, Weijie Xie et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 169 citations
- Perceptually-guided Dual-mode Virtual Reality System For Motion-adaptive DisplayHui Zeng, Rong ZhaoIEEE VR 2023 · 3 citations
- Towards Understanding Depth Perception in Foveated RenderingSophie Kergaßner, Taimoor Tariq, Piotr DidykSIGGRAPH 2025 · 5 citations
