Promises are made to be broken: migrating R to strict semantics
Aviral Goel, Jan Jecmen, Sebastián Krynski, Olivier Flückiger, Jan Vitek
Abstract
Function calls in the R language do not evaluate their arguments, these are passed to the callee as suspended computations and evaluated if needed. After 25 years of experience with the language, there are very few cases where programmers leverage delayed evaluation intentionally and laziness comes at a price in performance and complexity. This paper explores how to evolve the semantics of a lazy language towards strictness-by-default and laziness-on-demand. To provide a migration path, it is necessary to provide tooling for developers to migrate libraries without introducing errors. This paper reports on a dynamic analysis that infers strictness signatures for functions to capture both intentional and accidental laziness. Over 99% of the inferred signatures were correct when tested against clients of the libraries.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get c9d399ea-60f0-43a5-8dab-27b528b35c00Related papers
- Designing types for R, empiricallyAlexi Turcotte, Aviral Goel, Filip Krikava, Jan VitekOOPSLA 2020 · 9 citations
- Statically Analyzing the Dataflow of R ProgramsFlorian Sihler, Matthias TichyOOPSLA 2025 · 3 citations
- What we eval in the shadows: a large-scale study of eval in R programsAviral Goel, Pierre Donat-Bouillud, Filip Krikava, Christoph M. Kirsch et al.OOPSLA 2021 · 3 citations
- Typing StrictnessDaniel Sainati, Joseph W. Cutler, Benjamin C. Pierce, Stephanie WeirichPOPL 2026
- A Study of Undefined Behavior Across Foreign Function Boundaries in Rust LibrariesIan McCormack, Joshua Sunshine, Jonathan AldrichICSE 2025 · 5 citations
