Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Vahid Balazadeh, Mohammadmehdi Ataei, Hyunmin Cheong, Amir Hosein Khasahmadi, Rahul G. Krishnan
Abstract
Physical reasoning remains a significant challenge for Vision-Language Models (VLMs). This limitation arises from an inability to translate learned knowledge into predictions about physical behavior. Although continual fine-tuning can mitigate this issue, it is expensive for large models and impractical to perform repeatedly for every task. This necessitates the creation of modular and scalable ways to teach VLMs about physical reasoning. To that end, we introduce Physics Context Builders (PCBs), a modular framework where specialized smaller VLMs are fine-tuned to generate detailed physical scene descriptions. These can be used as physical contexts to enhance the reasoning capabilities of larger VLMs. PCBs enable the separation of visual perception from reasoning, allowing us to analyze their relative contributions to physical understanding. We perform experiments on CLEVRER and on Falling Tower, a stability detection dataset with both simulated and real-world scenes, to demonstrate that PCBs provide substantial performance improvements, increasing average accuracy by up to 13.8% on complex physical reasoning tasks. Notably, PCBs also show strong Sim2Real transfer, successfully generalizing from simulated training data to real-world scenes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c94af809-8f72-4300-af19-12b1d7ac5d75Cited by top-tier papers4
- PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One SuiteSiyuan Zhou, Hejun Wang, Hu Cheng, Jinxi Li et al.CVPR 2026 · 9 citations
- CueTip: An Interactive and Explainable Physics-aware Pool AssistantSean Memery, Kevin Denamganaï, Jiaxin Zhang, Zehai Tu et al.SIGGRAPH 2025
- Can Vision Language Models Learn Intuitive Physics from Interaction?Luca M. Schulze Buschoff, Konstantinos Voudouris, Can Demircan, Eric SchulzICML 2026
- Vision Language Models Cannot Reason About Physical TransformationDezhi Luo, Yijiang Li, Maijunxian Wang, Tianwei Zhao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Static Vision: Scene Dynamic Field Unlocks Intuitive Physics Understanding in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsNanxi Li, Xiang Wang, Yuanjie Chen, Haode Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
- Detecting Violations of Physical Common Sense in Images: A Challenge Dataset and Effective ModelWeibin Wu, Zitong Wang, Zhengjie Luo, Wenqing Chen et al.ACM MM 2025
- MAPS: Advancing Multi-Modal Reasoning in Expert-Level Physical ScienceErle Zhu, Yadi Liu, Zhe Zhang, Xujun Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Dynamics: Language-Based Representation for Inferring Rigid-Body Dynamics From VideosChia-Hsiang Kao, Cong Phuoc Huynh, Chien-Yi Wang, Noranart Vesdapunt et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- SIMPACT: Simulation-Enabled Action Planning using Vision-Language ModelsHaowen Liu, Shaoxiong Yao, Haonan Chen, Jiawei Gao et al.CVPR 2026 · 8 citations
