What can I do here? A Theory of Affordances in Reinforcement Learning
Khimya Khetarpal, Zafarali Ahmed, Gheorghe Comanici, David Abel, Doina Precup
Abstract
Reinforcement learning algorithms usually assume that all actions are always available to an agent. However, both people and animals understand the general link between the features of their environment and the actions that are feasible. Gibson (1977) coined the term "affordances" to describe the fact that certain states enable an agent to do certain actions, in the context of embodied agents. In this paper, we develop a theory of affordances for agents who learn and plan in Markov Decision Processes. Affordances play a dual role in this case. On one hand, they allow faster planning, by reducing the number of actions available in any given situation. On the other hand, they facilitate more efficient and precise learning of transition models from data, especially when such models require function approximation. We establish these properties through theoretical results as well as illustrative examples. We also propose an approach to learn affordances and use it to estimate transition models that are simpler and generalize better.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c91a6d0e-0422-42fd-9517-ec3c412ac3d4Cited by top-tier papers10
- Generating Adjacency-Constrained Subgoals in Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningTianren Zhang, Shangqi Guo, Tian Tan, Xiaolin Hu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 112 citations
- Relative Variational Intrinsic ControlKate Baumli, David Warde-Farley, Steven Hansen, Volodymyr MnihAAAI 2021 · 45 citations
- CCIL: Continuity-Based Data Augmentation for Corrective Imitation LearningLiyiming Ke, Yunchu Zhang, Abhay Deshpande, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa et al.ICLR 2024 · 33 citations
- Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMsDavid Venuto, Mohammad Sami Nur Islam, Martin Klissarov, Doina Precup et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- Rediscovering Affordance: A Reinforcement Learning PerspectiveYi-Chi Liao, Kashyap Todi, Aditya Acharya, Antti Keurulainen et al.CHI 2022 · 22 citations
Builds on3
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- Hierarchical Foresight: Self-Supervised Learning of Long-Horizon Tasks via Visual Subgoal GenerationSuraj Nair, Chelsea FinnICLR 2020 · 152 citations
- Options of Interest: Temporal Abstraction with Interest FunctionsKhimya Khetarpal, Martin Klissarov, Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.AAAI 2020 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Temporally Abstract Partial ModelsKhimya Khetarpal, Zafarali Ahmed, Gheorghe Comanici, Doina PrecupNeurIPS 2021 · 17 citations
- Provably Efficient Representation Learning with Tractable Planning in Low-Rank POMDPJiacheng Guo, Zihao Li, Huazheng Wang, Mengdi Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 8 citations
- Possibility Before Utility: Learning And Using Hierarchical AffordancesRobby Costales, Shariq Iqbal, Fei ShaICLR 2022 · 5 citations
- Provable Representation with Efficient Planning for Partially Observable Reinforcement LearningHongming Zhang, Tongzheng Ren, Chenjun Xiao, Dale Schuurmans et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Distributional Active InferenceAbdullah Akgül, Gulcin Baykal, Manuel Haussmann, Mustafa Mert Çelikok et al.ICML 2026
