DISC: Dynamic Decomposition Improves LLM Inference Scaling
Jonathan Light, Wei Cheng, Benjamin Rivière, Yue Wu, Masafumi Oyamada, Mengdi Wang, Yisong Yue, Santiago Paternain, Haifeng Chen
Abstract
Inference scaling methods for LLMs often rely on decomposing problems into steps (or groups of tokens), followed by sampling and selecting the best next steps. However, these steps and their sizes are often predetermined or manually designed based on domain knowledge. We propose dynamic decomposition, a method that adaptively and automatically partitions solution and reasoning traces into manageable steps during inference. By more effectively allocating compute -- particularly through subdividing challenging steps and prioritizing their sampling -- dynamic decomposition significantly improves inference efficiency. Experiments on benchmarks such as APPS, MATH, and LiveCodeBench demonstrate that dynamic decomposition outperforms static approaches, including token-level, sentence-level, and single-step decompositions, reducing the pass@10 error rate by 5.0%, 6.7%, and 10.5% respectively. These findings highlight the potential of dynamic decomposition to improve a wide range of inference scaling techniques.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c86e0ab7-3adb-4aa7-9581-ea67946b1627Cited by top-tier papers2
- Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time ScalingXinglin Wang, Yiwei Li, Shaoxiong Feng, Peiwen Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Escaping Whack-a-Mole: Optimizing Documentation as Repo-Specific Playbooks for Coding AgentsYutong Cheng, Haifeng Chen, Wenchao Yu, Xujiang Zhao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on28
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
Related papers
- D-LLM: A Token Adaptive Computing Resource Allocation Strategy for Large Language ModelsYikun Jiang, Huanyu Wang, Lei Xie, Hanbin Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- φ-Decoding: Adaptive Foresight Sampling for Balanced Inference-Time Exploration and ExploitationFangzhi Xu, Hang Yan, Chang Ma, Haiteng Zhao et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
- OptScale: Probabilistic Optimality for Inference-time ScalingYoukang Wang, Jian Wang, Rubing Chen, Xiao-Yong WeiAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- FOCUS: DLLMs Know How to Tame Their Compute BoundKaihua Liang, Xin Tan, An Zhong, Hong Xu et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Hierarchy Decoding: A Training-free Parallel Decoding Strategy for Diffusion Large Language ModelsXiaojing Qi, Lun Du, Xinyuan Zhang, Lanning Wei et al.ICLR 2026
