Interpret and Improve In-Context Learning via the Lens of Input-Label Mappings
Chenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Le Lu, Houqiang Li, Xinmei Tian, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) excel at downstream NLP tasks through in-context learning (ICL) with a few demonstrations of input-label pairs. However, the internal mechanisms behind ICL remain under-explored, particularly the mappings between inputs and labels. In this work, we reverse-engineer ICL by examining input-label mappings: what they are within LLMs, where they function, and how LLMs utilize them. ( 1 ) what: We discover input-label mappings stored within a few specific layers in the form of principal components (PCs), which capture human-interpretable and task-related words. ( 2 ) where: We propose a PC patching approach to identify the modules where input-label mappings function. Specifically, PC patching automatically crafts counterfactual representations using identified semantic PCs, rather than manually designing counterfactual text, to suppress the behavior related to LLM capability for ICL-related modules. Utilizing PC patching, we identify LLMs apply inputlabel mappings in a small fraction (5%) of attention heads. (3) how: We observe and verify that the identified key heads utilize input-label mappings from demonstrations to generate target labels for new queries. Based on these discoveries, we further show that precisely fine-tuning key ICL-related modules leads to significant improvements across diverse tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c85d82e5-0a4f-4279-9f79-d20beb54ddc4Cited by top-tier papers4
- Localizing Task Recognition and Task Learning in In-Context Learning via Attention Head AnalysisHaolin Yang, Hakaze Cho, Naoya InoueICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Interpreting and Enhancing Emotional Circuits in Large Vision-Language Models via Cross-Modal Information FlowChengsheng Zhang, Chenghao Sun, Zhining Xie, Xinmei TianICML 2026
- Bridging the Language Gap: Uncovering and Aligning Shared Circuits for Multi-Hop Reasoning in Multilingual LLMsChenghao Sun, Zhen Huang, Yonggang Zhang, Xinmei Tian et al.AAAI 2026
- Tracing the Persona Circuit: How Large Language Models Encode and Express Character TraitsGuanzheng Qin, Chenghao Sun, Zhining Xie, Xinmei TianICML 2026
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation AnalysisJesse Vig, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Sharon Qian et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 851 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
- Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free LunchLe Yu, Bowen Yu, Haiyang Yu, Fei Huang et al.ICML 2024 · 605 citations
Related papers
- Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context LearningLean Wang, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Deli Chen et al.EMNLP 2023 · 26 citations
- What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task HypothesisJiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan CotterellACL 2024 · 5 citations
- When Parts Are Greater Than Sums: Individual LLM Components Can Outperform Full ModelsTing-Yun Chang, Jesse Thomason, Robin JiaEMNLP 2024
- Revisiting In-context Learning Inference Circuit in Large Language ModelsHakaze Cho, Mariko Kato, Yoshihiro Sakai, Naoya InoueICLR 2025
- The Missing Alignment Link of In-context Learning on SequencesHarshvardhan Agarwal, Sunita SarawagiICML 2025
