Action Manifold Smoothing: A Lipschitz Pathway Perspective on High-Dimensional Reinforcement Learning
Zhihao Lin
Abstract
High-dimensional continuous control remains challenging in deep reinforcement learning, where algorithms like TD3 and SAC often collapse. We propose a unifying Lipschitz Pathway framework that decomposes instability into four amplification stages, namely action parameterization (), dynamics sensitivity (), Q-network curvature (), and temporal-difference (TD) target stability (), where errors compound multiplicatively along the learning pipeline. Our analysis identifies a discrete-continuous mismatch as the root cause: value functions trained from sparse point samples must generalize over continuous manifolds, leading to multiplicative error amplification along the pathway. To address this, we introduce Action Manifold Smoothing (AMS), which replaces point-wise TD targets with orthogonally-sampled neighborhood averages, jointly regularizing (via implicit Laplacian smoothing) and (via local manifold supervision). We further characterize when Lipschitz-constrained Q-networks and geometric action priors are beneficial based on task structure. Empirically, AMS enables both TD3 and SAC to achieve over 400 reward on the 38-D Dog Run task within 1M steps, where baselines fail. These results validate the Lipschitz pathway as a principled framework for diagnosing and solving stability bottlenecks in high-dimensional control.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c827ac59-0d3e-4c20-ab36-0fef9d85d935Builds on9
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from PixelsDenis Yarats, Ilya Kostrikov, Rob FergusICLR 2021 · 911 citations
- TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous ControlNicklas Hansen, Hao Su, Xiaolong WangICLR 2024 · 388 citations
- Implementation Matters in Deep RL: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOLogan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas, Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras et al.ICLR 2020 · 305 citations
- Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy OptimizationYunhao Tang, Shipra AgrawalAAAI 2020 · 150 citations
Related papers
- LipsNet: A Smooth and Robust Neural Network with Adaptive Lipschitz Constant for High Accuracy Optimal ControlXujie Song, Jingliang Duan, Wenxuan Wang, Shengbo Eben Li et al.ICML 2023 · 19 citations
- A Primer on SO(3) Action Representations in Deep Reinforcement LearningMartin Schuck, Sherif Samy, Angela P. SchoelligICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- SAC Flow: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning of Flow-Based Policies via Velocity-Reparameterized Sequential ModelingYixian Zhang, Shu'ang Yu, Tonghe Zhang, Mo Guang et al.ICLR 2026 · 33 citations
- Implicit Action Chunking for Smooth Continuous ControlBosun Liang, Shuo Pei, Zirui Chen, Chuanzhi Fan et al.ICML 2026
- Policy Optimization in a Noisy Neighborhood: On Return Landscapes in Continuous ControlNate Rahn, Pierluca D'Oro, Harley Wiltzer, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 11 citations
