CONGA:Confidence-and-Gradient-Aware Learning Rate Schedule for Test Time Adaptation
Shaoran Lv, Xinyao Li, Jingjing Li
Abstract
Test-time adaptation (TTA) adapts pretrained models to test data on-the-fly. Current TTA methods have focused on what to adapt: lightweight domain-aware components (prompts, normalization statistics) updated with consistency-aware self-supervised losses. This work investigates the more fundamental yet underexplored optimization process, providing insights and guidelines on how to appropriately update models for TTA. By analyzing the optimization error during TTA, we identify a pivotal stability-plasticity trade-off: the model should adapt to novel distributions while retaining learned knowledge, which motivates our design of a CONfidence-and-Gradient-Aware scheduler (CONGA) to constrain model learning rate (LR) within an adaptive exploration interval. For each iteration, the lower bound encourages model exploration on informative confident samples, while the upper bound prevents aggressive overfitting to noisy optimization gradients. Based on our theoretical findings, an adaptation-progress-conditioned cosine decay function decides the specific LR within the interval. As an LR scheduler, CONGA is naturally applicable on existing TTA methods as a plug-in module, introducing little computation overheads. Extensive experiments and analysis demonstrate the superiority and validness of CONGA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c7768115-cd11-44fc-a1fd-c01ba5899fb0Builds on23
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,294 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
- Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationJian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi FengICML 2020 · 1,624 citations
- Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution ShiftsYu Sun, Xiaolong Wang, Zhuang Liu, John Miller et al.ICML 2020 · 1,220 citations
Related papers
- Test-Time Learning for Large Language ModelsJinwu Hu, Zitian Zhang, Guohao Chen, Xutao Wen et al.ICML 2025
- Gradient Alignment Improves Test-Time Adaptation for Medical Image SegmentationZiyang Chen, Yiwen Ye, Yongsheng Pan, Yong XiaAAAI 2025 · 12 citations
- Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time AdaptationYulu Gan, Yan Bai, Yihang Lou, Xianzheng Ma et al.AAAI 2023 · 145 citations
- Learning to Generate Gradients for Test-Time Adaptation via Test-Time Training LayersQi Deng, Shuaicheng Niu, Ronghao Zhang, Yaofo Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- When and Where to Reset Matters for Long-Term Test-Time AdaptationTaejun Lim, Joong-Won Hwang, Kibok LeeICLR 2026 · 3 citations
