FM2024Top-tier venue
VeriQR: A Robustness Verification Tool for quantum Machine Learning Models
Yanling Lin, Ji Guan, Wang Fang, Mingsheng Ying, Zhaofeng Su
Abstract
Abstract Adversarial noise attacks present a significant threat to quantum machine learning (QML) models, similar to their classical counterparts. This is especially true in the current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum era, where noise is unavoidable. Therefore, it is essential to ensure the robustness of QML models before their deployment. To address this challenge, we introduce VeriQR, the first tool designed specifically for formally verifying and improving the robustness of QML models, to the best of our knowledge. This tool mimics real-world quantum hardware’s noisy impacts by incorporating random noise to formally validate a QML model’s robustness. VeriQR supports exact (sound and complete) algorithms for both local and global robustness verification. For enhanced efficiency, it implements an under-approximate (complete) algorithm and a tensor network-based algorithm to verify local and global robustness, respectively. As a formal verification tool, VeriQR can detect adversarial examples and utilize them for further analysis and to enhance the local robustness through adversarial training, as demonstrated by experiments on real-world quantum machine learning models. Moreover, it permits users to incorporate customized noise. Based on this feature, we assess VeriQR using various real-world examples, and experimental outcomes confirm that the addition of specific quantum noise can enhance the global robustness of QML models. These processes are made accessible through a user-friendly graphical interface provided by VeriQR, catering to general users without requiring a deep understanding of the counter-intuitive probabilistic nature of quantum computing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on6
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- Robustness Verification of Semantic Segmentation Neural Networks Using Relaxed ReachabilityHoang-Dung Tran, Neelanjana Pal, Patrick Musau, Diego Manzanas Lopez et al.CAV 2021 · 39 citations
- Robustness Verification of Quantum ClassifiersJi Guan, Wang Fang, Mingsheng YingCAV 2021 · 38 citations
- CoqQ: Foundational Verification of Quantum ProgramsLi Zhou, Gilles Barthe, Pierre-Yves Strub, Junyi Liu et al.POPL 2023 · 33 citations
- Verifying Fairness in Quantum Machine LearningJi Guan, Wang Fang, Mingsheng YingCAV 2022 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Quantum ClassifiersGautham Anil, Vishnu Vinod, Apurva NarayanAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- QuantumNAT: quantum noise-aware training with noise injection, quantization and normalizationHanrui Wang, Jiaqi Gu, Yongshan Ding, Zirui Li et al.DAC 2022 · 60 citations
- QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum CircuitsHanrui Wang, Yongshan Ding, Jiaqi Gu, Yujun Lin et al.HPCA 2022 · 199 citations
- SoK: Critical Evaluation of Quantum Machine Learning for Adversarial RobustnessSaeefa Rubaiyet Nowmi, Jesus Rafael Lopez, Md Mahmudul Alam Imon, Shahrooz Pouryousef et al.S&P 2026 · 6 citations
- On the Relation between Trainability and Dequantization of Variational Quantum Learning ModelsElies Gil-Fuster, Casper Gyurik, Adrián Pérez-Salinas, Vedran DunjkoICLR 2025
