Parameterizing Context: Unleashing the Power of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning and In-Context Tuning for Continual Table Semantic Parsing
Yongrui Chen, Shenyu Zhang, Guilin Qi, Xinnan Guo
Abstract
Continual table semantic parsing aims to train a parser on a sequence of tasks, where each task requires the parser to translate natural language into SQL based on task-specific tables but only offers limited training examples. Conventional methods tend to suffer from overfitting with limited supervision, as well as catastrophic forgetting due to parameter updates. Despite recent advancements that partially alleviate these issues through semi-supervised data augmentation and retention of a few past examples, the performance is still limited by the volume of unsupervised data and stored examples. To overcome these challenges, this paper introduces a novel method integrating parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and in-context tuning (ICT) for training a continual table semantic parser. Initially, we present a task-adaptive PEFT framework capable of fully circumventing catastrophic forgetting, which is achieved by freezing the pre-trained model backbone and fine-tuning small-scale prompts. Building on this, we propose a teacher-student framework-based solution. The teacher addresses the few-shot problem using ICT, which procures contextual information by demonstrating a few training examples. In turn, the student leverages the proposed PEFT framework to learn from the teacher's output distribution, and subsequently compresses and saves the contextual information to the prompts, eliminating the need to store any training examples. Experimental evaluations on two benchmarks affirm the superiority of our method over prevalent few-shot and continual learning baselines across various metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c730ef17-ece1-491d-95d6-f2f8d7cc0f4bCited by top-tier papers2
- K-DeCore: Facilitating Knowledge Transfer in Continual Structured Knowledge Reasoning via Knowledge DecouplingYongrui Chen, Yi Huang, Yunchang Liu, Shenyu Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Triples as the Key: Structuring Makes Decomposition and Verification Easier in LLM-based TableQAZhen Yang, Ziwei Du, Minghan Zhang, Wei Du et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning to Prompt for Continual LearningZifeng Wang, Zizhao Zhang, Chen-Yu Lee, Han Zhang et al.CVPR 2022 · 635 citations
- Specializing Smaller Language Models towards Multi-Step ReasoningYao Fu, Hao Peng, Litu Ou, Ashish Sabharwal et al.ICML 2023 · 347 citations
- A Unified Continual Learning Framework with General Parameter-Efficient TuningQiankun Gao, Chen Zhao, Yifan Sun, Teng Xi et al.ICCV 2023 · 152 citations
- Text-to-SQL Generation for Question Answering on Electronic Medical RecordsPing Wang, Tian Shi, Chandan K. ReddyWWW 2020 · 148 citations
Related papers
- Filling Memory Gaps: Enhancing Continual Semantic Parsing via SQL Syntax Variance-Guided LLMs Without Real Data ReplayRuiheng Liu, Jinyu Zhang, Yanqi Song, Yu Zhang et al.AAAI 2025 · 5 citations
- InfLoRA: Interference-Free Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual LearningYan-Shuo Liang, Wu-Jun LiCVPR 2024
- Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningHaokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,483 citations
- Semantically-Shifted Incremental Adapter-Tuning is A Continual ViTransformerYuwen Tan, Qinhao Zhou, Xiang Xiang, Ke Wang et al.CVPR 2024 · 14 citations
- Continual Prompt Tuning for Dialog State TrackingQi Zhu, Bing Li, Fei Mi, Xiaoyan Zhu et al.ACL 2022
