KL Guided Domain Adaptation
A. Tuan Nguyen, Toan Tran, Yarin Gal, Philip H. S. Torr, Atilim Gunes Baydin
Abstract
Domain adaptation is an important problem and often needed for real-world applications. In this problem, instead of i.i.d. training and testing datapoints, we assume that the source (training) data and the target (testing) data have different distributions. With that setting, the empirical risk minimization training procedure often does not perform well, since it does not account for the change in the distribution. A common approach in the domain adaptation literature is to learn a representation of the input that has the same (marginal) distribution over the source and the target domain. However, these approaches often require additional networks and/or optimizing an adversarial (minimax) objective, which can be very expensive or unstable in practice. To improve upon these marginal alignment techniques, in this paper, we first derive a generalization bound for the target loss based on the training loss and the reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the source and the target representation distributions. Based on this bound, we derive an algorithm that minimizes the KL term to obtain a better generalization to the target domain. We show that with a probabilistic representation network, the KL term can be estimated efficiently via minibatch samples without any additional network or a minimax objective. This leads to a theoretically sound alignment method which is also very efficient and stable in practice. Experimental results also suggest that our method outperforms other representation-alignment approaches.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c716ca5c-4805-41d6-b801-5f1b5229efe2Cited by top-tier papers14
- FedSR: A Simple and Effective Domain Generalization Method for Federated LearningA. Tuan Nguyen, Philip H. S. Torr, Ser Nam LimNeurIPS 2022 · 153 citations
- Optimal Representations for Covariate ShiftYangjun Ruan, Yann Dubois, Chris J. MaddisonICLR 2022 · 77 citations
- CoCo: A Coupled Contrastive Framework for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Graph ClassificationNan Yin, Li Shen, Mengzhu Wang, Long Lan et al.ICML 2023 · 62 citations
- ProtGO: Function-Guided Protein Modeling for Unified Representation LearningBozhen Hu, Cheng Tan, Yongjie Xu, Zhangyang Gao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- Large Scale Dataset Distillation with Domain ShiftNoel Loo, Alaa Maalouf, Ramin M. Hasani, Mathias Lechner et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on3
- Domain Adaptation with Conditional Distribution Matching and Generalized Label ShiftRemi Tachet des Combes, Han Zhao, Yu-Xiang Wang, Geoffrey J. GordonNeurIPS 2020 · 231 citations
- Domain Invariant Representation Learning with Domain Density TransformationsA. Tuan Nguyen, Toan Tran, Yarin Gal, Atilim Gunes BaydinNeurIPS 2021 · 121 citations
- f-Domain Adversarial Learning: Theory and AlgorithmsDavid Acuna, Guojun Zhang, Marc T. Law, Sanja FidlerICML 2021 · 77 citations
Related papers
- CASUAL: Conditional Support Alignment for Domain Adaptation with Label ShiftAnh T. Nguyen, Lam Tran, Anh Tong, Tuan-Duy H. Nguyen et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- Theoretical Performance Guarantees for Partial Domain Adaptation via Partial Optimal TransportJayadev Naram, Fredrik Hellström, Ziming Wang, Rebecka Jörnsten et al.ICML 2025
- Prompt-based Distribution Alignment for Domain Generalization in Text ClassificationChen Jia, Yue ZhangEMNLP 2022 · 4 citations
- Log-Likelihood Ratio Minimizing Flows: Towards Robust and Quantifiable Neural Distribution AlignmentBen Usman, Avneesh Sud, Nick Dufour, Kate SaenkoNeurIPS 2020 · 14 citations
- Learning Invariant Representations and Risks for Semi-Supervised Domain AdaptationBo Li, Yezhen Wang, Shanghang Zhang, Dongsheng Li et al.CVPR 2021
