Revisiting Spatial Invariance with Low-Rank Local Connectivity
Gamaleldin F. Elsayed, Prajit Ramachandran, Jonathon Shlens, Simon Kornblith
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks are among the most successful architectures in deep learning with this success at least partially attributable to the efficacy of spatial invariance as an inductive bias. Locally connected layers, which differ from convolutional layers only in their lack of spatial invariance, usually perform poorly in practice. However, these observations still leave open the possibility that some degree of relaxation of spatial invariance may yield a better inductive bias than either convolution or local connectivity. To test this hypothesis, we design a method to relax the spatial invariance of a network layer in a controlled manner; we create a low-rank locally connected layer, where the filter bank applied at each position is constructed as a linear combination of basis set of filter banks with spatially varying combining weights. By varying the number of basis filter banks, we can control the degree of relaxation of spatial invariance. In experiments with small convolutional networks, we find that relaxing spatial invariance improves classification accuracy over both convolution and locally connected layers across MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CelebA datasets, thus suggesting that spatial invariance may be an overly restrictive prior.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c704118e-c8ec-45d6-b581-a6d6faa6f29eCited by top-tier papers14
- ConViT: Improving Vision Transformers with Soft Convolutional Inductive BiasesStéphane d'Ascoli, Hugo Touvron, Matthew L. Leavitt, Ari S. Morcos et al.ICML 2021 · 1,021 citations
- Rethinking Spatial Invariance of Convolutional Networks for Object CountingZhi-Qi Cheng, Qi Dai, Hong Li, Jingkuan Song et al.CVPR 2022 · 119 citations
- Approximately Equivariant Networks for Imperfectly Symmetric DynamicsRui Wang, Robin Walters, Rose YuICML 2022 · 111 citations
- Meta-learning Symmetries by ReparameterizationAllan Zhou, Tom Knowles, Chelsea FinnICLR 2021 · 105 citations
- TAda! Temporally-Adaptive Convolutions for Video UnderstandingZiyuan Huang, Shiwei Zhang, Liang Pan, Zhiwu Qing et al.ICLR 2022 · 72 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Theoretical Analysis of the Inductive Biases in Deep Convolutional NetworksZihao Wang, Lei WuNeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
- On Translation Invariance in CNNs: Convolutional Layers Can Exploit Absolute Spatial LocationOsman Semih Kayhan, Jan C. van GemertCVPR 2020
- How much Position Information Do Convolutional Neural Networks Encode?Md. Amirul Islam, Sen Jia, Neil D. B. BruceICLR 2020 · 392 citations
- Towards Biologically Plausible Convolutional NetworksRoman Pogodin, Yash Mehta, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Peter E. LathamNeurIPS 2021 · 30 citations
- Learning Filter Basis for Convolutional Neural Network CompressionYawei Li, Shuhang Gu, Luc Van Gool, Radu TimofteICCV 2019 · 106 citations
