Training Dynamics Impact Post-Training Quantization Robustness
Albert Catalan-Tatjer, Niccolò Ajroldi, Jonas Geiping
Abstract
While post-training quantization is widely adopted for efficient deployment of large language models, the mechanisms underlying quantization robustness remain unclear. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of quantization degradation across open-source language model training trajectories up to 32B parameters and 15T training tokens to accurately assess the relationship between training dynamics and quantization performance. Our key finding is that quantization errors in large-scale training runs are driven by a complex interplay between learning rate and other training hyperparameters. Specifically, once learning rates decay, validation loss and quantization error diverge, largely independent of training data scale. To investigate interventions on the training dynamics and identify specific configurations that can modulate quantization robustness favorably, we train our own models in controlled experiments up to 100B tokens, and analyze how the loss curvature evolves and interacts with the learning rate during training. Our results challenge the assumption that increasing dataset scale inherently compromises quantization effectiveness, demonstrating instead that strategic training hyperparameter interventions can improve quantization quality at scale.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c6f3efbd-6204-4127-9fe9-4f28d9cf7ca1Cited by top-tier papers2
- Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic ForgettingIshaan Watts, Catherine Li, Sachin Goyal, Jacob Mitchell Springer et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Weight Decay Improves Language Model PlasticityTessa Han, Sebastian Bordt, Hanlin Zhang, Sham KakadeICML 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on27
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
Related papers
- Low-Bit Quantization Favors Undertrained LLMsXu Ouyang, Tao Ge, Thomas Hartvigsen, Zhisong Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Scaling Laws for PrecisionTanishq Kumar, Zachary Ankner, Benjamin Frederick Spector, Blake Bordelon et al.ICLR 2025
- CBQ: Cross-Block Quantization for Large Language ModelsXin Ding, Xiaoyu Liu, Zhijun Tu, Yun Zhang et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- LeanQuant: Accurate and Scalable Large Language Model Quantization with Loss-error-aware GridTianyi Zhang, Anshumali ShrivastavaICLR 2025
- Beyond Outliers: A Study of Optimizers Under QuantizationGeorgios Vlassis, Saleh Ashkboos, Alexandra Volkova, Torsten Hoefler et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
