USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
Privacy Law Enforcement Under Centralized Governance: A Qualitative Analysis of Four Years' Special Privacy Rectification Campaigns
Tao Jing, Yao Li, Jingzhou Ye, Jie Wang, Xueqiang Wang
Abstract
In recent years, major privacy laws like the GDPR have brought about positive changes. However, challenges remain in enforcing the laws, particularly due to under-resourced regulators facing a large number of potential privacy-violating software applications (apps) and the high costs of investigating them. Since 2019, China has launched a series of privacy enforcement campaigns known as Special Privacy Rectification Campaigns (SPRCs) to address widespread privacy violations in its mobile application (app) ecosystem. Unlike the enforcement of the GDPR, SPRCs are characterized by large-scale privacy reviews and strict sanctions, under the strong control of central authorities. In SPRCs, central government authorities issue administrative orders to mobilize various resources for market-wide privacy reviews of mobile apps. They enforce strict sanctions by requiring privacy-violating apps to rectify issues within a short timeframe or face removal from app stores. While there are a few reports on SPRCs, the effectiveness and potential problems of this campaign-style privacy enforcement approach remain unclear to the community. In this study, we conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with app-related engineers involved in SPRCs to better understand the campaign-style privacy enforcement. Based on the interviews, we reported our findings on a variety of aspects of SPRCs, such as the processes that app engineers regularly follow to achieve privacy compliance in SPRCs, the challenges they encounter, the solutions they adopt to address these challenges, and the impacts of SPRCs, etc. We found that app engineers face a series of challenges in achieving privacy compliance in their apps...
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c6f00814-2a00-4007-8fef-a716f68f8fa0Builds on14
- Privacy Policies over Time: Curation and Analysis of a Million-Document DatasetRyan Amos, Gunes Acar, Elena Lucherini, Mihir Kshirsagar et al.WWW 2021 · 135 citations
- Privacy Champions in Software Teams: Understanding Their Motivations, Strategies, and ChallengesMohammad Tahaei, Alisa Frik, Kami VanieaCHI 2021 · 75 citations
- Share First, Ask Later (or Never?) Studying Violations of GDPR's Explicit Consent in Android AppsTrung Tin Nguyen, Michael Backes, Ninja Marnau, Ben StockUSENIX Security 2021 · 70 citations
- Understanding Challenges for Developers to Create Accurate Privacy Nutrition LabelsTianshi Li, Kayla Reiman, Yuvraj Agarwal, Lorrie Faith Cranor et al.CHI 2022 · 56 citations
- Consistency Analysis of Data-Usage Purposes in Mobile AppsDuc Bui, Yuan Yao, Kang G. Shin, Jong-Min Choi et al.CCS 2021 · 41 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Chinese Internet Users' Perceptions of, and Online Platforms' Compliance with, the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)Morgana Mo Zhou, Zhiyan Qu, Jinhan Wan, Bo Wen et al.CSCW 2024 · 9 citations
- Privacy Perspectives and Practices of Chinese Smart Home Product TeamsShijing He, Yaxiong Lei, Xiao Zhan, Chi Zhang et al.S&P 2026 · 9 citations
- Short Text, Large Effect: Measuring the Impact of User Reviews on Android App Security & PrivacyDuc Cuong Nguyen, Erik Derr, Michael Backes, Sven BugielS&P 2019 · 66 citations
- PriAgent: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Auditing Android Privacy ComplianceZiwei Zhang, Zhao Li, Zhuojun Jiang, Jiangyi Yin et al.AAAI 2026
- Is It a Trap? A Large-scale Empirical Study And Comprehensive Assessment of Online Automated Privacy Policy Generators for Mobile AppsShidong Pan, Dawen Zhang, Mark Staples, Zhenchang Xing et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 18 citations
