Effects of Dropout on Performance in Long-range Graph Learning Tasks
Jasraj Singh, Keyue Jiang, Brooks Paige, Laura Toni
Abstract
Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) are a class of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that propagate information across the graph via local neighborhoods. The scheme gives rise to two key challenges: over-smoothing and over-squashing. While several Dropout-style algorithms, such as DropEdge and DropMessage, have successfully addressed over-smoothing, their impact on over-squashing remains largely unexplored. This represents a critical gap in the literature, as failure to mitigate over-squashing would make these methods unsuitable for long-range tasks -- the intended use case of deep MPNNs. In this work, we study the aforementioned algorithms, and closely related edge-dropping algorithms -- DropNode, DropAgg and DropGNN -- in the context of over-squashing. We present theoretical results showing that DropEdge-variants reduce sensitivity between distant nodes, limiting their suitability for long-range tasks. To address this, we introduce DropSens, a sensitivity-aware variant of DropEdge that explicitly controls the proportion of information lost due to edge-dropping, thereby increasing sensitivity to distant nodes despite dropping the same number of edges. Our experiments on long-range synthetic and real-world datasets confirm the predicted limitations of existing edge-dropping and feature-dropping methods. Moreover, DropSens consistently outperforms graph rewiring techniques designed to mitigate over-squashing, suggesting that simple, targeted modifications can substantially improve a model's ability to capture long-range interactions. Our conclusions highlight the need to re-evaluate and re-design existing methods for training deep GNNs, with a renewed focus on modelling long-range interactions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c60848e5-ef18-495d-a0a6-30c7b0f3ed43Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on31
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node ClassificationYu Rong, Wenbing Huang, Tingyang Xu, Junzhou HuangICLR 2020 · 1,599 citations
- DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go As Deep As CNNs?Guohao Li, Matthias Müller, Ali K. Thabet, Bernard GhanemICCV 2019 · 1,586 citations
Related papers
- On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and TopologyFrancesco Di Giovanni, Lorenzo Giusti, Federico Barbero, Giulia Luise et al.ICML 2023 · 190 citations
- DRew: Dynamically Rewired Message Passing with DelayBenjamin Gutteridge, Xiaowen Dong, Michael M. Bronstein, Francesco Di GiovanniICML 2023 · 90 citations
- Locality-Aware Graph Rewiring in GNNsFederico Barbero, Ameya Velingker, Amin Saberi, Michael M. Bronstein et al.ICLR 2024 · 64 citations
- Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvatureJake Topping, Francesco Di Giovanni, Benjamin Paul Chamberlain, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2022 · 628 citations
- Probabilistic Graph Rewiring via Virtual NodesChendi Qian, Andrei Manolache, Christopher Morris, Mathias NiepertNeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
