Benchmark Design and Prior-independent Optimization
Jason D. Hartline, Aleck C. Johnsen, Yingkai Li
Abstract
This paper compares two leading approaches for robust optimization in the models of online algorithms and mechanism design. Competitive analysis compares the performance of an online algorithm to an offline benchmark in worst-case over inputs, and prior-independent mechanism design compares the expected performance of a mechanism on an unknown distribution (of inputs, i.e., agent values) to the optimal mechanism for the distribution in worst case over distributions. For competitive analysis, a critical concern is the choice of benchmark. This paper gives a method for selecting a good benchmark. We show that optimal algorithm/mechanism for the optimal benchmark is equal to the prior-independent optimal algorithm/mechanism. We solve a central open question in prior-independent mechanism design, namely we identify the prior-independent revenue-optimal mechanism for selling a single item to two agents with i.i.d. and regularly distributed values. We use this solution to solve the corresponding benchmark design problem. Via this solution and the above equivalence of prior-independent mechanism design and competitive analysis (a.k.a. prior-free mechanism design) we show that the standard method for lower bounds of prior-free mechanisms is not generally tight for the benchmark design program.11For the full version of this work, see https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10157.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c5e051ae-15aa-4b69-8c3b-6847e07077a2Cited by top-tier papers6
- Beyond Regularity: Simple versus Optimal Mechanisms, RevisitedYiding Feng, Yaonan JinFOCS 2025 · 6 citations
- Revelation gap for pricing from samplesYiding Feng, Jason D. Hartline, Yingkai LiSTOC 2021 · 4 citations
- Rationality-Robust Information Design: Bayesian Persuasion under Quantal ResponseYiding Feng, Chien-Ju Ho, Wei TangSODA 2024 · 3 citations
- Benchmark-Tight Approximation Ratio of Simple Mechanism for a Unit-Demand BuyerYaonan Jin, Pinyan LuFOCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Prior-Independent Auctions for Heterogeneous BiddersGuru Guruganesh, Aranyak Mehta, Di Wang, Kangning WangSODA 2024
Related papers
- On the Robustness of Mechanism Design under Total Variation DistanceAnuran Makur, Marios Mertzanidis, Alexandros Psomas, Athina TerzoglouNeurIPS 2023 · 4 citations
- Prior-Free Mechanism with Welfare GuaranteesGuru Guruganesh, Jon Schneider, Joshua R. WangWWW 2024
- On Robustness to k-Wise Independence of Optimal Bayesian MechanismsNick Gravin, Zhiqi WangFOCS 2024 · 4 citations
- Prior-independent Dynamic Auctions for a Value-maximizing BuyerYuan Deng, Hanrui ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 8 citations
- Multidimensional Bayesian Utility Maximization: Tight Approximations to WelfareKira Goldner, Taylor LundyNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
